‘What I’ve Seen in the Last 2 Years Is Unprecedented’: Physician on COVID Vaccine Side Effects on Pregnant Women; "Former Pfizer VP: 'Adverse impacts on conception and ability to sustain a pregnancy"
‘What I’ve Seen in the Last 2 Years Is Unprecedented’: Physician on COVID Vaccine Side Effects on Pregnant Women; "Former Pfizer VP: 'Adverse impacts on conception and ability to sustain a pregnancy"
(1) Dr. Judy Milkovits expressed her concerns early on about syncytin and the spike protein in vaxx. Syncytin plays a crucial part in carrying a foetus to term. (2) thalidomide was used as an antiemetic in the 50’s 60’s. This article states it is a sedative. (3) mRNA accumulates in the ovaries. Ovarian cancer increase on the increase post jabs.
THIS WAS NOT THE CASE 5 OR 6 WEEKS AGO BUT IS NOW TRUE.
Let's look at the death data for those ≥80 years of age, from week 3 (the fraud) onwards:
-----------------------------------------
Period A B C (deaths per 100,000)
-----------------------------------------
week03 39 309 270
week04 57 322 265
week05 78 326 248
week06 103 324 221
week07 114 280 165
week08 120 243 124
week09 120 190 70
week10 110 152 42
week11 101 141 40
week12 90 134 44
week13 84 122 37
Column A is deaths among those "suitably triple jabbed" per 100,000
Column B is the deaths among the un-vaccinated per 100,000
Column C is Column B minus Column A
-----------------------------------------
So Column C is the number of deaths that are prevented for every 100,000 people who are vaccinated. If this number is negative then it records the number of deaths caused by the vaccines (per 100,000 vaccinated).
Graphing Column C we can see that as it approaches zero it levels off (from week 10 onwards). This is due to those presenting the data finding some fraud to keep the data positive, or simply making up the data. Anything, to keep the data from proving that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
Anyway, after manipulating the data for the weeks 10, 11, 12, and 13, the evil people decided that the data was henceforth always going to show that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving, so they stopped publishing the data. To provide a plausible excuse for this they had to arrange for the UK Government to stop paying for covid-19 testing, so that is what they did. In the week 14 surveillance report they state:
"From 1 April 2022, the UK Government ended provision of free universal covid-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor covid-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published."
The relevant data can be found in the following PDF:
(1) Dr. Judy Milkovits expressed her concerns early on about syncytin and the spike protein in vaxx. Syncytin plays a crucial part in carrying a foetus to term. (2) thalidomide was used as an antiemetic in the 50’s 60’s. This article states it is a sedative. (3) mRNA accumulates in the ovaries. Ovarian cancer increase on the increase post jabs.
It's terrible that any physician would have promoted these to anyone, but pregnant women. Malpractice in my book.
First,It grieved me to no end that they were pushing this as safe to pregnant women, of course they would.their goal is depopulation.
unfortunately one can't read the article without subscribing...
PROOF THAT THE "VACCINES" INCREASE SICKNESS AND DEATH.
http://www.preearth.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1184
THIS WAS NOT THE CASE 5 OR 6 WEEKS AGO BUT IS NOW TRUE.
Let's look at the death data for those ≥80 years of age, from week 3 (the fraud) onwards:
-----------------------------------------
Period A B C (deaths per 100,000)
-----------------------------------------
week03 39 309 270
week04 57 322 265
week05 78 326 248
week06 103 324 221
week07 114 280 165
week08 120 243 124
week09 120 190 70
week10 110 152 42
week11 101 141 40
week12 90 134 44
week13 84 122 37
Column A is deaths among those "suitably triple jabbed" per 100,000
Column B is the deaths among the un-vaccinated per 100,000
Column C is Column B minus Column A
-----------------------------------------
So Column C is the number of deaths that are prevented for every 100,000 people who are vaccinated. If this number is negative then it records the number of deaths caused by the vaccines (per 100,000 vaccinated).
Graphing Column C we can see that as it approaches zero it levels off (from week 10 onwards). This is due to those presenting the data finding some fraud to keep the data positive, or simply making up the data. Anything, to keep the data from proving that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving.
Image/Graph http://www.preearth.net/images/deaths-caused-saved-by-vaccines.png
Anyway, after manipulating the data for the weeks 10, 11, 12, and 13, the evil people decided that the data was henceforth always going to show that the vaccines are killing more than they are saving, so they stopped publishing the data. To provide a plausible excuse for this they had to arrange for the UK Government to stop paying for covid-19 testing, so that is what they did. In the week 14 surveillance report they state:
"From 1 April 2022, the UK Government ended provision of free universal covid-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor covid-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published."
The relevant data can be found in the following PDF:
http://www.preearth.net/pdfs/the-vaccines-are-killing-you.pdf
Terrible the article is behind a paywall
Maljournalism