Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche and Dr. Paul Elias Alexander discuss the damage by the COVID vaccines in subverting the innate immune system in children; Geert provides informative background on vaccines
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche and Dr. Paul Elias Alexander discuss the damage by the COVID vaccines in subverting the innate immune system in children; Geert provides informative background on vaccines
Honestly, at this point it would take a lethal variant that only targets vaccinated individuals to get the masses to begin questioning the so-called, approved 'science'.
Geert has been more accurate than anyone else if you've followed him. Here he explains what is forthcoming and sadly it will be during our elections, hijacked by Biden lock us down again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F530dxcB6_s&t=43s
There should never have been a global mass population ‘vaccine solution’ against this disease - it was known from the beginning it wasn’t a serious threat to most people.
How did this happen? Who decided on this vaccine response, on what basis?
We’re now seeing a medical and political disaster unfolding, with people of all ages and health status being pressured, coerced and manipulated to submit to fast-tracked and experimental Covid-19 ‘leaky vaccines’, trashing people’s right to bodily autonomy and valid voluntary informed consent.
Again, it should not have happened…
Where were members of the scientific and medical establishment at this time, why weren’t they questioning the Covid-19 ‘vaccine response’?
Meanwhile, members of the public were left to raise the important questions, see for example my BMJ rapid response, published in response to an article on The British Medical Journal in March 2020: https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1089/rr-6
Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2
Dear Editor
If children, young adults and others can mount their own effective immune response to SARS-CoV2, is it ethical to impede their ability to access natural immunity by interfering with the natural progression of the virus?
According to the WHO, "Illness due to COVID-19 infection is generally mild, especially for children and young adults."[1]
Is the focus on future fast-tracked vaccine products blocking full consideration of the opportunity for natural herd immunity? Who is Neil Ferguson to say "The only exit strategy [in the] long term for this is really vaccination or other forms of innovative technology that allows us to control transmission".[2]
In regards to young people's and others' right to natural immunity, it's also vital to consider the startling admission by Heidi Larson, Director of The Vaccine Confidence Project, during the recent WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, i.e. "...We've shifted the human population...to dependency on vaccine-induced immunity...We're in a very fragile state now. We have developed a world that is dependent on vaccinations".[3]
This is a very alarming statement by Professor Larson, particularly with the prospect of other epidemics emerging in the future. We have to learn to deal with epidemics and illnesses as they emerge, it's not feasible to vaccinate the global population against every threat.
In a recent article raising concern about making decisions about this pandemic without reliable data, John Ioannidis notes that "School closures may also diminish the chances of developing herd immunity in an age group that is spared serious disease".[4] The UK's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, raised the prospect of developing natural herd immunity[5], but this idea was subsequently howled down by Matt Hancock, the UK secretary of state for health and social care[6], and others such as Willem van Schaik, a professor of microbiology and infection, as reported by the Science Media Centre.[7]
Again, is it ethical to deny children, young people and others their opportunity for natural immunity, and to plan to make them dependent on vaccine-induce immunity, to in effect make them dependent on the vaccine industry?
This is even more serious to consider in light of emerging vaccine product failures, e.g. pertussis and mumps.
The international community must be assured that independent and objective thinkers are carefully considering the way ahead on this matter.
Elizabeth M Hart
Independent citizen investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy, Adelaide, Australia
They were able to perpetrate this farce,this control because of people in rebellion,rejecting God.thinking that they could have it their way and be safe and prosperous without the perceived chains of God's law.The fear of dieing comes from the fear of the unknown, these people have no assurance of the here after.they don't believe in The one and only True God maker of heaven and earth.If your truly saved you face death with faith that you will be in paradise with the Creator. To be absent in the body is to be present with The Lord.His laws are not grievous but bring safety and blessing. Reject your folly and embrace The Holy One of Israel. Shalom.
Every passing day it appears more likely that this will end in an epic failure. Next winter is going to be rough, Geert has a track record of like 90% correct predictions, especially those regarding the overall trend of the pandemic.
Paul, I have been going to J J Couey’s website: gigaohmbiological.com to get my education in the biology of viruses. Sars Cov 2 in particular. He is a talented, entertaining, and, in my mind, extremely important teacher. To get to the bottom of what this pandemic / virus is doing, one has to be educated in this unfamiliar (to most) field. This is where I’m getting my education. You will like this guy, and with your reach m, maybe help get the word out.
Honestly, at this point it would take a lethal variant that only targets vaccinated individuals to get the masses to begin questioning the so-called, approved 'science'.
Pfizer has asked for the go ahead to inoculate babies! Pfizer is a murder machine. Nothing makes any sense anymore.
Geert has been more accurate than anyone else if you've followed him. Here he explains what is forthcoming and sadly it will be during our elections, hijacked by Biden lock us down again https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F530dxcB6_s&t=43s
I read Geerts first paper warning of this.
My friends poo poo it.
Oh he doesn’t know what he’s talking about…..
There should never have been a global mass population ‘vaccine solution’ against this disease - it was known from the beginning it wasn’t a serious threat to most people.
How did this happen? Who decided on this vaccine response, on what basis?
We’re now seeing a medical and political disaster unfolding, with people of all ages and health status being pressured, coerced and manipulated to submit to fast-tracked and experimental Covid-19 ‘leaky vaccines’, trashing people’s right to bodily autonomy and valid voluntary informed consent.
Again, it should not have happened…
Where were members of the scientific and medical establishment at this time, why weren’t they questioning the Covid-19 ‘vaccine response’?
Meanwhile, members of the public were left to raise the important questions, see for example my BMJ rapid response, published in response to an article on The British Medical Journal in March 2020: https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1089/rr-6
Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2
Dear Editor
If children, young adults and others can mount their own effective immune response to SARS-CoV2, is it ethical to impede their ability to access natural immunity by interfering with the natural progression of the virus?
According to the WHO, "Illness due to COVID-19 infection is generally mild, especially for children and young adults."[1]
Is the focus on future fast-tracked vaccine products blocking full consideration of the opportunity for natural herd immunity? Who is Neil Ferguson to say "The only exit strategy [in the] long term for this is really vaccination or other forms of innovative technology that allows us to control transmission".[2]
In regards to young people's and others' right to natural immunity, it's also vital to consider the startling admission by Heidi Larson, Director of The Vaccine Confidence Project, during the recent WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, i.e. "...We've shifted the human population...to dependency on vaccine-induced immunity...We're in a very fragile state now. We have developed a world that is dependent on vaccinations".[3]
This is a very alarming statement by Professor Larson, particularly with the prospect of other epidemics emerging in the future. We have to learn to deal with epidemics and illnesses as they emerge, it's not feasible to vaccinate the global population against every threat.
In a recent article raising concern about making decisions about this pandemic without reliable data, John Ioannidis notes that "School closures may also diminish the chances of developing herd immunity in an age group that is spared serious disease".[4] The UK's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, raised the prospect of developing natural herd immunity[5], but this idea was subsequently howled down by Matt Hancock, the UK secretary of state for health and social care[6], and others such as Willem van Schaik, a professor of microbiology and infection, as reported by the Science Media Centre.[7]
Again, is it ethical to deny children, young people and others their opportunity for natural immunity, and to plan to make them dependent on vaccine-induce immunity, to in effect make them dependent on the vaccine industry?
This is even more serious to consider in light of emerging vaccine product failures, e.g. pertussis and mumps.
The international community must be assured that independent and objective thinkers are carefully considering the way ahead on this matter.
Elizabeth M Hart
Independent citizen investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy, Adelaide, Australia
They were able to perpetrate this farce,this control because of people in rebellion,rejecting God.thinking that they could have it their way and be safe and prosperous without the perceived chains of God's law.The fear of dieing comes from the fear of the unknown, these people have no assurance of the here after.they don't believe in The one and only True God maker of heaven and earth.If your truly saved you face death with faith that you will be in paradise with the Creator. To be absent in the body is to be present with The Lord.His laws are not grievous but bring safety and blessing. Reject your folly and embrace The Holy One of Israel. Shalom.
Every passing day it appears more likely that this will end in an epic failure. Next winter is going to be rough, Geert has a track record of like 90% correct predictions, especially those regarding the overall trend of the pandemic.
The video stopped abruptly. Where is the full interview, what happened?
Paul, I have been going to J J Couey’s website: gigaohmbiological.com to get my education in the biology of viruses. Sars Cov 2 in particular. He is a talented, entertaining, and, in my mind, extremely important teacher. To get to the bottom of what this pandemic / virus is doing, one has to be educated in this unfamiliar (to most) field. This is where I’m getting my education. You will like this guy, and with your reach m, maybe help get the word out.