Maurice Cunningham is a political scientist with a deep interest in how Dark Money influences education policy. His motto is: “Dark Money never sleeps.” He is a master at following the money. He customarily blogs at a website called MassPoliticsProfs, but was kind enough to send me this post first.
He writes here about the groups pushing the attacks on critical race theory:
The Corporate Critical Race Theory Attack: Chaos is the Product
“The backlash” begins an opinion piece in Newsweek by Parents Defending Education outreach director Erika Sanzi, and these may be the most accurate two words published by those who are attacking “wokeness,” gender studies, and Critical Race Theory. The sad fact is that white backlash has a proven record of effectiveness in American politics and it is once again being employed in the service of right wing corporate interests. The end product desired has less to do with CRT than with spreading disruption, fear, and chaos across America’s most important democratic public institution, schools.
According to the Washington Post, as of June 24 CRT (a theory developed in law schools and not well known among most Americans) has exploded on Fox News. The term was heard on Fox only 132 times in 2020 but has been mentioned 1,860 times this year, escalating month by month. The narrative is that grassroots parents groups have discovered the threat CRT poses to their children in schools and have arisen organically across the country to form local parent groups, a movement noticed and captured by websites and the powerful Fox News. The truth is that of an oligarch-funded and coordinated campaign using time tested techniques.
Follow the Money
Over the past five years I’ve been following “education reform” groups created by billionaire investors with names like Families for Excellent Schools, Massachusetts Parents United, and National Parents Union which have presented diversity as their public face while attacking teachers. So when I saw the launch of Parents Defending Education on March 30 I took note because it follows a different path: white backlash aimed more at school boards, superintendents, and principals. The first thing to do when evaluating these groups is always, follow the money.
But as the financial backers of groups like PDE well know, public disclosure of funders will only come about nearly two years down the road, if then, in publicly available Form 990 tax returns for organizations with Internal Revenue Code 501(c)(3)status as charitable organizations. PDE president Nicole Neily has refused to disclose the organization’s donors when asked by media outlets. It’s not just that she won’t. She can’t. Disclosure would likely reveal ties to radical right funders tied into the Koch network and similar underwriters. We know this thanks to work done by PRWatch and from Sourcewatch at the Center for Media and Democracy. They show that Neily is a political operative at Koch network funded operations like the Independent Women’s Forum, Franklin Center, and Speech First.
The Speech First association is instructive. Neily is founding president of that non-profit as well. Sourcewatch has identified some of its funders as the Bader Family Foundation for $30,000, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund: $500,250, Judicial Education Project for $1,000,000, and National Philanthropic Trust: $500,000. The real check writers will probably never become known. Form 990s show that Neily is the sole employee, earning $161,000 in 2018 and $150,000 in 2019. Speech First brings lawsuits against universities for policies touching on race. For this, it paid the law firm Consovoy McMullen $950,000 in 2018, and to get the word out paid the Republican communications firm Creative Response Concepts $106,000. Boiled down, Speech First is a pass through that allows wealthy conservative donors to remain hidden while paying Consovoy McMullen to attack universities.
And who represents Parents Defending Education? Why, Consovoy McMullen. William Consovoy also represents Donald Trump and clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas. The firm is conservative legal royalty. PDE did not hire it after an especially successful bake sale.
Parents Defending Education, No Left Turn in Education, and Moms for Liberty
PDE launched its well-developed website featuring pages with links to its allies, most of which were branches of groups called No Left Turn in Education and Moms for Liberty. According to NBC, No Left Turn in Education was launched in 2020 when a parent from a Philadelphia suburb became enraged at her children’s school for teaching concepts of racism after the police murder of George Floyd. Elana Yaron Fishbein then sprang into action to attack wokeness and founded NLTE. In September she appeared on Fox’s Tucker Carlson program and the next day the group’s Facebook increased from about 200 followers to over 30,000 and there are now 30 chapters in 23 states.
But when I looked at local NLTE chapters’ Facebook pages linked to through the PDE site in April, I found sparse membership: Alabama, 7; Arkansas, 3; Delaware, 6; Iowa, 2; Idaho, 4; Indiana, 8; Michigan (Betsy DeVos home state), 13; Mississippi, 3; Montana, 2; North Dakota, 2; Massachusetts, 17; Hawaii, 1. All of the NLTE Facebook pages featured the same banner, a montage of diverse teens against a background of school lockers, each student smiling and engaged, not a pimple on their perfect teenage faces; probably models, most certainly not local students. As for Moms for Liberty, it too had sparse membership in its affiliates: Arizona, 17; Wright Co, Minnesota, 8; Corpus Christi Nueces, Texas, 70. Moms for Liberty’s creation story is similar to others in the anti-public education universe: “moms on a mission to stoke the fires of liberty.” The story goes that two parents became upset with their local schools and started up a parents group. It happens. It’s a lot more unusual for the two grassroots moms to then book former Fox host Megyn Kelly for a fundraiser with tickets running from General Admission of $50 up to Presenting Sponsor for $20,000 with perks including a photo with Ms. Kelly and corporate logo on print and online marketing materials.
From Parents Defending Education, No Left Turn in Education, Moms for Liberty and on to groups like National Parents Union, the creation stories are similar. A handful of disgruntled moms talk over their frustrations, determine to start their moms or parents group to seek change, and then in pour the millions of dollars; contracts are quickly signed with nationally recognized public relations firms and pollsters (one newly birthed charter school-tied group in Rhode Island immediately hired a Biden pollster); the head mom is booked on Fox or featured in national media outlets. Conservative outlets like The Federalist, Washington Times, Campus Fix, and most importantly Fox News amplify the misleading message.
How to Attack Educators in a Few Easy Steps
The tactics for going after K-12 educators did not spring up anew but have been adapted from successful attacks on college and university professors. Isaac Kamola has explained this in an important article titled Dear Administrators: To Protect Your Faculty from Right-Wing Attacks, Follow the Money. Kamola finds that groups like Campus Reform and Campus Fix, which pay conservative students as “reporters” to whistleblow on their professors, are funded by wealthy right wingers including Koch who wish to gain leverage over what is taught and researched at America’s universities. These attacks follow a common script. Something a professor says or writes in research, a lecture, or even on social media is grabbed and most often taken out of context; there is never an engagement with the actual intellectual product. (In Shadow Network: Media, Money, and the Secret Hub of the Radical Right, Anne Nelson shows that Campus Reform is tied into right wing clearing house organizations the Leadership Institute and Council for National Policy). The targets are often scholars of color, especially women, and their work focuses on race or inquiries into capitalism. The out of context remarks are then percolated through a right wing ecosystem which includes web sites funded by the same network and all the way up to Fox News. Results can be stark. After Campus Reform did a story on a speech by Princeton University professor Keenga-Yamahtta Taylor the piece was picked up by Fox; threats against Professor Taylor were so virulent she cancelled talks in Seattle and San Diego. After Campus Reform misrepresented remarks by Trinity College professor Johnny Williams the campus had to be shut down due to threats and Williams was unfairly placed on leave. So the radical right knows how to generate chaos. Parents Defending Education has refined the play book further.
PDE relies upon two modes of attack on schools (which may include charter as well as public schools). The first, often well covered in the media and with appearances on Fox, is individuals who inundate school districts with public records requests. The second involves anonymous attacks on school personnel, concealment guaranteed by guidance offered by PDE to assure their agents remain hidden.
NBC News reported on one now famous Fox-supported attack by an individual wielding public law requests. A Maine parent named Shawn McBreairty was disgruntled with his local schools and joined No Left Turn in Education. He has filed over 50 public records law request with his Maine school district, tying up education professionals serving the public for his individual crusade. In South Kingstown, RI a parent whose child is enrolled but not yet attending kindergarten in the town filed 200 public records law requests “seeking copies of middle and high school curricula, lists of all books related to gender available in the library and 10 years’ worth of harassment complaints and emails.” The district estimated it would take 300 hours to fulfill the request. Local officials were undoubtedly right in assessing the attack as an effort to disrupt public education and attack a public good. The Rhode Island parent was rewarded with an appearance on Fox. When districts try to resist the onslaught of requests, corporate spokespersons like PDE’s Sanzi are ready with pro-wrestling sincerity to whine—to Fox News—about the people’s right to know. These groups weaponize the very openness of government to undermine government.
In a forthcoming work, Kamola and co-author Ralph Wilson show how groups like Speech First use discovery in lawsuits to create a “nightmare for administrators and their general counsel.” PDE and allies are now using public records lawsnationwide to achieve the same goal against public school districts.
While the public records requests are designedly onerous and discouraging, at least educators can tell where the attacks are coming from. The second tactic promoted by PDE is much worse, to encourage anonymous attacks against educators.
Take a recent example involving the Boston suburb of Wellesley, Massachusetts. This was an anonymous complaint forwarded by PDE grumbling that Wellesley had violated civil rights laws by providing affinity rooms for students to process their emotions after anti-Asian attacks across the nation. Ms. Neily confessed she has no idea who submitted it to PDE or if anyone in Wellesley agrees with the complaint. This is a baked in design by PDE as we see from examining the operation’s website page that teaches How to Create “Woke At” Pages. It provides detailed instructions for how to set up “an anonymous, safe Instagram page.” First set up a Gmail account “that can’t be tied to you.” Gmail is recommended because the site creator will also need to set up “an anonymous Google Form . . . which allows you to receive anonymous tips” that shields the informant’s identity, even from the Woke At administrator. At all times “we recommend erring on the side of secrecy.”
The Woke At instructions encourage PDE’s local spies to check out social media pages of educators which may reveal woke attitudes. The Understanding Woke Jargon page catalogs terms like “social justice” or “antiracism” the group finds offensive. Questions to Ask School Officials offers gotcha questions that can be asked of woke school officials “with cameras rolling.”
Why the advice to always act with hidden identities? Because of the terrifying disposition of those “woke activists” who talk about “inclusion, equity, justice” but are really “divisive, toxic, and extreme.” PDE is one education organization that was absent on the day irony was taught, for it insists on secrecy while pretending it promotes transparency. Concealment is especially important “given how angry and retaliatory many woke activists get when criticized.” PDE understands that much of its audience consumes a heavy diet of Fox News. Research by Jeffrey M. Berry, James M. Glaser, and Deborah J. Schildkraut shows Fox’s “underlying strategy is to anger viewers by stoking their resentment of racial and ethnic minority groups” and building fear. For instance, after the images of George Floyd’s murder, which initially shocked even Sean Hannity, Fox repeatedly showed video of “rioting and looting by protestors, relying on film showing fires burning and Blacks running out of looted stores with stolen merchandise in their arms.” These images were repeatedly shown well beyond the first week, after which there was little new such behavior to report upon. But the coverage stokes ideas of lawlessness and fear.
Whether by an avalanche of public records requests or generating negative coverage from anonymous tipsters, PDE and its allies are in business to create disruption and chaos in public education.
Getting Results
As Kamola has shown with his work detailing the corporate backed assault on higher education, these tactics often work. They are now working at the K-12 level. Public records requests have tied up school boards and administrators. NBC reports that Washoe County, Nevada halted in person school board meetings “after residents filled a large auditorium and lobbed insults and threats of violence during the public comment portion.” When open meetings later convened in a smaller venue, many residents waited long hours in the hot sun to make their comments against CRT and anti-discrimination policies—including quite a fewwho do not even have students in the system. “During the most recent meeting, which lasted 11 hours, speakers railed at school board members, calling them Marxists, racists, Nazis and child abusers, among other epithets.” In Rockwood Illinois, the St. Louis Post dispatch reported, teachers called upon the school board and superintendent to protect them against “personal attacks and outright threats of violence.” In Camas, Washington, the state’s 2020 teacher of the year thanked the school board and administrators for defending her efforts to promote inclusion and access after some residents “railed against the school district’s ‘woke’ agenda, COVID-19 mask mandates, remote learning and racial justice and equity programs.”
After all, as No Left Turn Maine’s Shawn McBreairty said in an email to NBC News, “This is a war with the left, and in war, tactics and strategy can become blurry.”
As the corporate agitators behind all this understand, they are making public service exhausting and distasteful, a campaign to drive good community members away from serving. This isn’t an unfortunate byproduct. We’ve seen it at the university level. It’s intentional.
The Rise of the Right Wing Moms
In announcing PDE’s complaint against the Columbus, Ohio public schools for its willingness to address racism in the wake of the police shooting of 16-year-old Ma’Khia Bryant, Ms. Neily acknowledged that no Columbus parent had complained, but that PDE was just a concerned group of parents. “We just all work from home,” Neily told the Columbus Post-Dispatch. “We’re all working moms.”
That sounds cozy and homey but Neily is a well-compensated veteran of numerous right wing organizations, including not only Speech First but the Cato Institute. Sourcewatch reports that “Nicole Neily has worked for many Koch-affiliated groups.” Ms. Sanzi has worked for billionaire funded school privatization groups, also bringing home a hefty paycheck. According to research from Mercedes Schneider the Education Post, an online publication originally funded by Eli Broad, paid Sanzi $121,000 in 2016 and $131,000 in 2017. She is also a “senior visiting fellow” at the Fordham Institute.
This is another area where patterns are not immediately visible but things become more clear years down the road when Form 990s become available. What we see is that following the emergence of these organizations with their tales of concerned moms banding together is that the moms are actually political operatives or communications professionals being well paid. Take for example Keri Rodrigues, “mom-in-chief” of the Walton backed Massachusetts Parents United. One of the several creation stories is that Ms. Rodrigues (always identified as a former union organizer) and a few other mothers gathered in their local library and decided to start a parents group. Actually, Ms. Rodrigues had been state director for Families for Excellent Schools, which ran a losing ballot campaign to increase charter schools in Massachusetts in 2016. She is also a communications professional, having been a radio host. MPU and an affiliate paid Ms. Rodrigues over $388,000 in 2017-2018. But the mom-in-chief story has had some penetration.
When the CDC announced reopening guidelines for schools in May 2021 Ms. Rodrigues, now also of Walton and Koch backed National Parents Union, appeared on Fox News to accuse teachers unions of undue influence. The host accused “teachers unions of basically writing the guidelines” a claim that Ms. Rodrigues enthusiastically agreed with. There was no basis for that claim other than that the unions, like over fifty other advocacy groups, had offered comments to the CDC. But it was blown up by Republican senators from a letter provided by a Republican dark money group. And then on to Fox and the eagerMs. Rodrigues.
Thus we shouldn’t be too surprised by a recent Media Matters study that showed that a number of the concerned parents featured on Fox News criticizing CRT are actually Republican political operatives. Quisha King, an African American woman billed by Fox News as an “everyday American” who is “Northeast Florida co-chair of Moms for Liberty” and “mom of two daughters” is also a GOP political consultant who worked for the Republican National Committee in 2020. Though Fox News billed Ms. Neily as a parent fighting against CRT in schools, Media Matters added that she “has spent her entire career working in and for libertarian and conservative political advocacy organizations and think tanks . . . .” PDE senior fellow Elizabeth Schultz was noted by Fox’s Dana Perino as a former Fairfax County, Virginia school board member. But she is also a former Trump appointee to the Department of Education, under Betsy DeVos. Before being defeated for re-election to the school board Schultz was known for opposing “‘expanding the school system’s sex-education curriculum to include lessons on gender identity and transgender issues’ and supporting armed teachers in classrooms.”
Charles Koch’s Pincer Movement
Far right groups like Parents Defending Education are new born but billionaire funded corporate education reform groups like Massachusetts Parents United and National Parents Union have been around a bit longer. Families for Excellent Schools was successful in New York until its 2016 Massachusetts charter school campaign was badly beaten, its dark money donors were ordered to be disclosed by the state’s Office of Campaign and Political Finance, and its CEO was fired after #MeToo allegations surfaced. These groups often present themselves as leaning liberal, non-partisan but vaguely Democratic, featuring spokespersons who are women of color, and advocating for their privatization policies as being pro-civil rights. National Parents Union even released a statement defending Critical Race Theory on May 21, but it seems to have dropped the topic since. Why then would Charles Koch, a likely source of support for the right wing groups, also be funding National Parents Union?
But he is, through his Charles Koch Institute, which is partnered with the Walton Family Foundation in a joint venture called the Vela Education Fund. Vela dropped $700,000 on NPU to promote home schooling. NPU then spread Vela funds around in grants for home schooling. As Casey Parks explained in The New Yorker these foundations “advocate ‘school choice’—rerouting money and families away from traditional public schools through such means as charter schools, which are publicly funded but privately managed, and vouchers, which allow public-education dollars to be put toward private-school tuition.” NPU had been launched by the Walton Family Foundation to help in the Waltons quest to undermine teachers unions. Recognizing the opportunity presented by closed schools Vela formed and wrote the $700,000 check even though NPUhad been in business only a few months. Vela has pursued other such opportunities including funding the far right Home School Legal Defense Association.
Coincidentally or not in 2017 the civil rights-proclaiming Ms. Rodrigues and the radical right Ms. Sanzi were partners in another venture named Planet Mom, which featured a podcast and proposed radio show. In her paid position at Education Post Ms. Sanzi wrote of Ms. Rodrigues “I consider her a partner in this work. And a friend.” It’s a small planet, after all.
The point is not Critical Race Theory, or charter schools, virtual schools, or home schools. The point is to undermine public education, keep taxes low, spread doubt of the efficacy of public goods, and demolish institutions like unions and local school communities that make demands on the Waltons and Kochs of the nation. It is, as Nancy MacLean has said, to put democracy in chains. Diverse-presenting National Parents Union and white backlash Parents Defending Education serve the same cause.
Whither We Are Tending and What to Do About It
I hope my colleagues in academia continue to speak out about the intellectual contributions of Critical Race Theory and the fine efforts of K-12 educators to provide the kind of schooling all our students need—open and honest about the nation’s race and history and our ongoing challenges, including corporate promoted white backlash.
On the other hand, don’t expect any engagement from Nicole Neily or the anti-CRT bard Christopher Rufo, who has helped spike this ridiculous campaign. In a triumphant appearance at the Claremont Institute, Rufo described his annoyance at scholars trying to bait him into a discussion of what CRT really means and proclaimed “I don’t give a shit about this stuff.” (Nine minute mark)
As Isaac Kamola has urged, start with follow the money and pursue that relentlessly. There’s a reason groups like PDE and NPU can’t come clean about their funding sources and amounts and that reason is that they know the public is suspicious of the Kochs and Waltons of the world and what’s more, the public and America’s billionaires are on a different page on policy issues.
These are corporate generated right wing attacks. Say it. Name names.
Come awake to the threat. Recognize what this is and that isn’t just about wokeness or even education but something else Koch and the Waltons can’t say out loud: to destroy the capacity of people to coalesce together and fight for a better life for themselves, a project that offends oligarchs ideologically and threatens their power and pocketbooks. They focus on educationbecause schools have been a fertile locale for white backlash but also a source of great progress, because teachers unions are a barrier to them, and because local community organizations defy them.
That means that teachers unions, school boards, superintendents, principals, lunch workers, school bus drivers, custodians, business, parents and students—everyone who serves their local school community—have to recognize that they need to fight together against this assault. In other words, join together to take action—exactly what the Waltons, Kochs, and other radical right billionaires fear.
And stand up for a real education for all our children, not the white(wash) backlash being promoted by phony AstroTurf fronts like Parents Defending Education. Remember, fronts are fronting for someone and in this case, fronting for radical right billionaires.
Money never sleeps. Follow the money.
Maurice T. Cunningham is recently retired as an associate professor at the University of Massachusetts at Boston and a union member. He is the author of the book Dark Money and the Politics of School Privatization, forthcoming in 2022.
“The point is not Critical Race Theory, or charter schools, virtual schools, or home schools. The point is to undermine public education, keep taxes low, spread doubt of the efficacy of public goods, and demolish institutions like unions and local school communities that make demands on the Waltons and Kochs of the nation.”
Awful, just awful. Thank you Maurice Cunningham for your in depth reporting and uncovering this. This reporting should be in every major newspaper.
People have the right to know the truth about these deceptive forces.
The mainstream media ignores Dark Money and goes to their paid agents to get comments.
Exactly. And the media presents their paid agents as if they were representing thousands or tens of thousands of concerned parents instead of paid to represent the view of the people who generously fund their organization, whose view is far more important than any of the (very few) parents in their organization.
Did Maurice Cunningham once do some research into how open those organizations are to parents joining them? I seem to recall their members seem to only represent other groups, and individual parents can’t necessarily join, or it is more cumbersome for them to join.
Would be great if the tens of thousands of public school parents who care about education and not pleasing some funders who generously pay other people’s salaries if they undermine public schools, joined those organizations (if they are even allowed to). Could they vote in the new officers? I suspect if they could elect their own spokespeople, those organizations would suddenly find that their funding dries up.
best line: THIS REPORTING should be in every major newspaper — add in, and on every major TV news outlet
“First set up a Gmail account “that can’t be tied to you.” Gmail is recommended because the site creator will also need to set up “an anonymous Google Form . . . which allows you to receive anonymous tips” that shields the informant’s identity, even from the Woke At administrator. At all times “we recommend erring on the side of secrecy.”
This should be illegal and those funding this willful deception of the public in this manner – should be held accountable.
This was insightful, fascinating, and frightening. Thank you, I will definitely share this.
But wait! There’s more! Our own homegrown collection of angry, privileged Oakland parents have predictably started their own nonprofit, OpenSchoolsCA, to “reimagine” public education in California. Their “advisors” include two ot the biggest school privatization names in The Town: David Castillo and former school board member Jumoke Hinton Hodge. Last year, Erika Sanzi was actively seeking these same anti-union Oakland parents via Twitter to troll for info for her teacher-bashing articles regarding school reopening. Keep your eyes on the prize and wait for the funders when the 990 becomes available.
https://www.openschoolsca.org/
Andrew Sullivan’s cogent arguments are behind my loathing of CRT.
Wesley Yang too.
Ponderosa…. I am always on the same page with your comments on this blog. I respect your viewpoints.
I am familiar with Andrew Sullivan, but was never a fan.
I thought, based on your comment that I should look up what AS is saying on CRT.
I don’t know enough specifically about CRT to discuss it on this blog – so I stay away. But I do know that inclusion, inclusivity and racial justice is vital.
Andrew Sullivan’s statement:
“The goal of education of children this young is to cement the notion at the most formative age that America is at its core an oppressive racist system uniquely designed to exploit, harm, abuse, and even kill the non-white” – Is blatantly false in my experiences.
Having multicultural representations of children in books and making sure everyone feels included and classrooms are responsive – is not brainwashing children to think they are oppressors.
This rant by Sullivan is hysterical. And I don’t mean in the funny sense – I mean related to hysterics.: https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/dont-ban-crt-expose-it-2d9
His characterization of the Biden administration as:
“under Biden, the entire federal government — have succumbed to an ideology deeply hostile to Western civilization, and uses brutal tactics of smearing and firing and ostracizing to enforce its will, you can end up in despair” …….. is, with all due respect, ridiculous.
My read of this piece is that AS takes little bits and pieces of examples (taken out of context) to draw dangerous generalizations.
beachtree,
Brilliant response. You just nailed classic Andrew Sullivan. That’s how he argues most points that I have seen, which is why even when he happens to be supporting something I agree with, I generally find his reasoning lacks much substance. Sullivan – a conservative – only seems reasonable compared to the far right neo fascists.
The reason I have a more liberal view in the last few decades is that I haven’t read convincing arguments from conservatives in a very long time. The “intelligent” ones from so-called “reasonable” conservatives like Sullivan use scare tactics that are pretty similar to the reasons that Nazis gave for why they had to round up Jews. Lots of the Germans clearly were convinced and likely told themselves “hey, I do remember knowing that one Jewish guy who said something “socialist”, and since I know the socialists want to take over our country and take away all my property and hurt my family, I am so grateful there are wise folks concerned with stopping those dangerous people.
Sullivan has been using racist tropes to present universities being taken over by the far left, with professors cowering in fear because they can’t speak the truth. It is not even close to the truth. And instead of presenting a reasonable defense of the few professors perhaps harmed by overzealous students who were offended by things they said, they cry “my freedom of speech is being infringed”. In fact, when I have actually looked into the specific details of what those professors were saying who cry “my freedom of speech”, the situation is almost always cases where they said quite offensive things, a student politely asked them not to continue to say that, politely explaining why it was offensive, and the professors decided that as a white man, he was the sole correct judge of what was offensive or not and he would continue to be just as offensive as he wanted and would amplify the offensiveness to make a point. With most reasonable professors, a student would come to them pointing out that something they said was offensive, they would consider what the student was saying, and respond “I’m sorry, I had not thought about that before, thanks for bringing it to my attention, and would stop doing that.”
It’s no different than Billy Crystal in blackface at the Oscars. When anti-racists expressed outrage, Crystal and the Oscars could have replied in the Andrew Sullivan/anti-CRT way and said “we deem that it isn’t offensive and will continue to do it” and provoke the critics into more anger, or Crystal and the Oscars could have apologized and stopped doing that. Crystal stopped doing it and apologized. He isn’t “cancelled”, but his use of blackface is. No doubt there are people like Andrew Sullivan who think it is the same thing.
your summation that only bits and pieces are used for dangerous generalizations covers our almost two decades of the reform game: so little reality behind soooo much hype
CxTheories in general, are post-modern literary disciplines which use targeted language to intentionally disrupt, confuse and destabilize society. The strategy is to blur distinctions between things, believing that clear definitions are used by an “oppressor” to oppress marginalized groups. It is ever shape shifting in order to keep society in a state of confusion and destabilization. These theories, injected into schools via Equity and Diversity curriculum are not a healthy world view and children are being hurt. This is not a Left vs Right issue….this is $$$ vs $$$ issue. Teach the factual history, discuss the factual history and the ramifications and outcomes …..but keep the “CxTheories” out of it!
Your post made some vague allusions to CRT using “targeting language to…intentionally destabilize society” – without offering an explanation. In fact, that describes what Donald Trump and the entire Republican party does, and not what CRT does. Unlike you, I will present an example: Donald Trump and the Republicans keep telling Americans that they election was stolen from them, without offering an iota of evidence, and repeated those lies so often that rthey got thousands of their followers to violently invade the Capitol to end democracyt and isntead install a leader who wasn’t elected, and thjose people were willing to kill and maim Capitol police officers to get their way, which is about as ‘destabilizing” as it can get.
Now usually this is the tiome when people yell “but BLM”, which suggests that you believe that white policemen should be allowed to kill any Black people they want to and you consider it “destabilizing’ that people would protest after endless examples of that kind of police brutality finally was enough.
The only people using “targeted language to destabilize society” are those who lie. Noticing the racism in America is not a lie. Denying that there is any racism in America, and saying that Donald Trump won the election is a lie. A lie designed to destabilize.
Pointing out something that happens that IS outrageous is not being “intentionally divisive”. Making up stuff to get people to become outraged when nothing outrageous has happened is “intentionally divisive”.
Lisa,
I also watched the entirety of the videos posted by anti-CRT folks of so-called “dangerous” educators saying something perfectly reasonable — not disruptive, destabilizing, confusing at all. Some people who like to foment outrage with warnings about how CRT will
“destabilize society” clearly think that anything that doesn’t promote the white supremacists’ view of history is “destabilizing”. It is similar to how those same anti-CRT people are angry that anyone would protest racist policing because they believe if we don’t condone racist policing by only very quietly mentioning it while allowing it to continue, that is too “destabilizing”, which is just their excuse because they are fine with racist policing. Their reasoning — it is better to let it continue than have any “destabilizing” protests, says it all. Those protests of real events are not destabilizing. Protests of made up outrages are.
“CxTheories in general, are post-modern literary disciplines which use targeted language to intentionally disrupt, confuse and destabilize society.”
Oh my gosh read up a little. Critical theory began with the Frankfurt school of thought in 1929 [well before post-modernism]; they were “Critical of capitalism and of Marxism–Leninism as philosophically inflexible systems of social organization, the School’s critical theory research indicated alternative paths to realizing the social development of a society and a nation.” (Wikipedia) More wiki: “Post-modernism is a broad movement that developed in the mid-to-late 20th century across philosophy, the arts, architecture, and criticism, marking a departure from modernism. The term has been more generally applied to describe a historical era said to follow after modernity and the tendencies of this era.”
There is a whole wiki article devoted to criticism of post-modernism, and a brief summary of critical theory criticism at wiki’s article on critical theory. Not a single one of these critiques resembles your “use [of] targeted language to intentionally disrupt, confuse and destabilize society.” Criticism generally falls along the lines of unsupported by intellectually rigorous reasoning, so broadly general as to be meaningless, lacking in any practical applicability, without problem-solving potential.
The whattheyarelearning.com site is right up your alley, Lisa.
Luke Rosiak of Daily Caller (Tucker Carlson) is integral to the site’s efforts.
Ya think the Capitol riots had a bit of a destabilizing effect? Wait…you believe it was an antifa ruse.
Stopping by Schoolboards on a Trolly Evening” (with apologies to Robert Frost)
Whose trolls these are
I think I know
His wealth is in the billions, though
He will not see me lurking here
To watch his trolls control the show
His comment whores would think it queer
To troll without a dollar near
Between the shimmer and the sheen
The propaganda’s thick round here
His trolls are worst we’ve ever seen
And rude and crude and really mean
They only ever act like creep
The biggest creep that’s ever been
The trolls are ugly, dark and deep
And they have promi$e$ to keep
And boards to troll before they sleep
And boards to troll before they sleep
I love your Frosty poems. ‘Stopping by schools on a doughy evening’ was a great rendition too, a ripping of Pearson.
That was the first poem I ever learned by heart — in 7th grade.
I never forgot it.
Not sure of that is a good thing, given how much time I have wasted on alternate renditions.
“Stomping on words on a Frosty evening”
Whose words these are
I think I know
His poems are in the pastures though
He will not see me stomping here
To see his words perverted so
For Robert Frost
Would think it queer
To write about a billionaire
Between the Kochs and William Gates
The darkest money that we fear
I give his greatest poems a shake
And that is doubtless a mistake
The only other sound’s the weep
Of Robert Frost, from earthy grave
The poems were lovely, dark and deep
By I have billionaires to bleep
And words to warp before I sleep
And words to warp before I sleep
Ah, you do keep me going with a good smile. “You’re a poet and you know it, and your toes show it. They’re longfellows.” (That was what reader KrazyTA once called KrazyTA “droggerel”. Hope KrazyTA is still krazy.)
KrazyTA’s posts were always very creative, informed and inspirational, as are yours and those of many others who comment here.
it is up at Oped news https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Maurice-Cunningham-Phony-in-General_News-Critical-Race-Theory_Diane-Ravitch_Education_Law-210731-252.html#comment793010
Book Review: ‘Shadow Network’ Offers A Lesson On The American Right’s Mastery Of Politics : NPR
https://www.npr.org/2019/10/29/774133071/shadow-network-offers-a-lesson-on-the-american-rights-mastery-of-politics
Cunning ham mentions this book.
“It’s always election season in America, which means that even people who only casually keep up with politics are bound to know the names of some of the organizations that influence our democracy.
“You don’t have to be a political junkie to know the names of the NRA, Institute for Legislative Action, Planned Parenthood Action Fund, American Civil Liberties Union or the Club for Growth PAC.
“But unless you breathe politics like it’s oxygen, you’re unlikely to have heard of a conservative organization called the Council for National Policy. The group isn’t a political action committee; rather, it’s a 501(c)(3) educational foundation that dates back to the first Reagan administration. And as Anne Nelson writes in her fascinating new book, Shadow Network, it’s had an outsize effect on the modern American political landscape.
“Nelson seeks to document the connections between “the manpower and media of the Christian right with the finances of Western plutocrats and the strategy of right-wing Republican political operatives.” Many of these connections, she writes, were made possible through the CNP, whose members have included such familiar names as Trump aide Kellyanne Conway, former White House strategist Steve Bannon, the Christian Coallition’s first executive director Ralph Reed and NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre.
Article continues after sponsor message.”
More evidence that there should be no billionaires.
I used to think the limit should be one billion dollars, then over time as the evidence of wealth causing corruption filled an ocean, I lowered the limit to $100 million
Now I’m down to $10 million in gross worth. Not net worth, but gross worth.
Even if he gave up all other wealth, that would mean Bill Gates could only occupy 1/15th of his Medina, WA monstrosity ( designed by a committee of Microsoft programmers.)
That’s just 4400 square feet!
The humanity!
Of course, Melinda would also be entitled to her 4400 square feet — as would each of their three kids — and Warren Buffet and 9 other billionaires. Talk about Full House! They could paint red lines on the floor to demarcate living spaces. Might not be easy, but it could be made to work.
I bet it already has 15 bathrooms, so it’s just a matter of properly partitioning the house to give each billionaire access.
They could have the same committee of MS programmers who designed the house do the partitioning.
I’m sure the kids would not mind to have Uncle Warren living there.
And they could put Uncle Warren between Bill and Melinda as a sort of Buffeter Zone
Yes. The Kochtopus is terrifying, and if I find myself fixated on it out of fear, I know that, with my attention diverted, the GATESTOPUS is robbing my house. There are too many Dark Money Jabberwocktopuses.
As an unrelated aside, and sorry to be tangential, maybe that should be Jabberwocktopi. It could be Jabberwocktopodes. Here’s a fun read for English class from Mirriam-Webster: https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/the-many-plurals-of-octopus-octopi-octopuses-octopodes.
Twas brillig, and the billionaires
Did lie and dissemble in the press
All flimsy were Deformer wares
And the charter rats did nest
Ours is not to reason why
Just to spell it “octopi”
Never heard of “octopode”
What a large manure lode
“Octopuses”, just one “s”?
English is an octo-mess
Kinda makes standardized English a bit of a joke, huh.
I wonder whether determined local govt couldn’t take on disruptive mass FOIA requests directly. How about South Kingstown, RI’s Bd of Ed requests suggestions from the public as to how strapped budget can accommodate processing 200 FOIA requests from a named parent, cost estimated at $7,500?– that will be covered in the local rag. How about a press release from SAD#51 (district covering Cumberland and N Yarmouth ME) to Portland’s Press Herald with an estimate of how much it will cost taxpayers to process 50 FOIA’s “filed by parent Shawn Breairty, member of No Left Turn in Education– one of the two groups Parents Defending Education lists as illustrating its national reach. PDE is run by Nicole Neily, a long-time worker with non-profits supported by donations from Koch Bros-affiliated orgs.”
Here’s a link to another of Prof Mo Cunningham’s posts. It’s instructive because Boston’s local media is knowledgeable and well respected, yet turn a blind eye to the shenanigans of folks like Keri Rodgrigues and Erika Sanzi. We’re in a whole lotta trouble, folks.
I always thought that if out-of-state billionaires could be proven to have entered the state using local fronts to change Massachusetts education policy that would be a great, great, great story. I’ve been proven wrong again, and again, and again. I still think it’s a great story, it’s just a great story that only gets told at a small political science blog. Why is that?
Because the Globe is owned by a billionaire who is a member of the same club?
Well, The Glob has been on the hate-on-Boston-Public-Schools-train for maybe 30 years, but has also recently outsourced its education reporting to the Barr Foundation, a privatizing fauxlanthropy. So there’s that.
That doesn’t explain the lack of coverage in other media, though. We have two prize winning public radion stations whose revelations of dark money funders has been scant. And the New Yorker recently included Rodrigues in a long piece on homeschooling.
https://t.co/74jTfqq7E3?amp=1
Any educator can see there wasn’t much fact checking on this piece – no kindergartener could possibly be suspended 36 times in a few months, for example; the school year is only 36 weeks long!
They spend lots of money for an expensive PR firm, Mercury LLC, and it seems they get bang for the buck. Cunningham has the receipts of that, too.
Mercury represents Eva Moskowitz’s charter chain.
The circle is complete.
Erika Sanzi…pathetic, horrible racist human being.
Tim Busch’s National Catholic Register (not to be confused with the National Catholic Reporter) posted a promotional piece about Erika Sansi’s efforts related to CRT.
The interviewer, Erika J. Ahern, prefaced the interview sewing together CRT, Catholic parents leaving public schools years ago, and the “creeping influence of progressive thought” in schools.
There’s a statement included, “parochial schools have much less of it.” The article title (July 21, 2021), “How parents can fight back against toxic agendas in the school”.
Ahern asked Erika how private school parents could utilize what Sansi is doing in public schools. I started laughing after Sansi’s reply included, “private school parents don’t have the same rights” as those in the public school community. She notes the lack of the right of FOIA requests in the private sphere.
Fordham is sinister. They hire a person who achieves her goals because of the rights that citizens have in a democratic government while Fordham uses billionaires’ money to privatize tax-funded schools eliminating citizens rights.
Everyone should read, “The new official contents of sex education in Mexico: laicism in the crosshairs”, by Armando Javier Diaz Camarena, posted at the Scielo site. The research is broad in scope and describes the strategies that are being used to undermine public schools
My first thought after reading Sansi’s “scary mom” blog post, “I failed. Reflections on Covington Catholic”, 1-26-2019-
Her style has a rat a tat tat quality like Laura Ingraham’s, the opposite of real reflection. There’s the built-in demand that we accept she’s right. I view the post’s content as a failed attempt to model Megan McCain’s sophistication in crafting an appearance of decency. McCain pretends she has one toe edging out of the right wing pool and that should convince us she’s a good person.
Sansi uses her short career as a teacher before she took a high paying job with Fordham to trash the people who stuck with teaching. She once tweeted about how absurd it was that people in poorer neighborhoods had more access to vaccines than the suburban neighborhoods. Of course, someone like her probably equates “more vaccines” with equal. The latest I saw was her turning up on pages of wealthy white moms pulling their hair out because we just won’t ignore the pandemic for the sake of their kids. She’s hoping to get these public school moms on her school choice side. Can’t say enough how awful and pathetic she is.
After reviewing their methods, I decided the type of place Fordham is and what type of people work there. Richard Phelps at Non-Partisan Education Review posted a damning chronology about Fordham’s rise to power. The organization is not held accountable for the deleterious effects of its policies on the citizens and taxpayers of Ohio.
[…] Cunningham, a political scientist who studies dark money’s influence on education policy, wrote on about groups pushing attacks on critical race theory on education activist Diane Ravitch’s […]
[…] Cunningham, a political scientist who studies dark money’s influence on education policy, wrote on about groups pushing attacks on critical race theory on education activist Diane Ravitch’s […]
[…] is a piece I originally did for Diane Ravitch’s blog, link here. With billionaire driven phony parents groups like Parents Defending Education, Parents United, […]
[…] The right-wing media turned quickly to elevate and platform these groups, more than happy to grant interviews to people like Parents Defending Education president Nicole Neily and outreach director Erika Sanzi, both of whom have deep industry ties. As political scientist Maurice Cunningham writes: […]