Whether you had a dog in this race (I did…) or not, the latest 888holdings decision regarding SIsportsbook and partnership with Authentic Brands Group has stirred the iGaming feed and rekindled a decade-old brand/media/gaming debate (for a few minutes at least, until the algo moves our collective ADHD onwards…)
This has enough fissile material for a longer post + discussion, but here are some key (proposed) takeaways:
1. The Coke Zero Paradox: in most cases media/brand companies want the great taste (revenues) but none of the calories (licensing, gambling association). No matter how big the meeting room is (having sat in most if not all of them at one point or another), if you’re not sitting opposite the CEO (physically or by delegation), it’s not a partnership you’re negotiating. You are calories. Nothing wrong with that, as long as both of you see it that way. It is incremental value to their business, but it’s all of yours.
2. Sexy vs. CPA: some brands garner awareness, some offer distribution and conversion, while others increase engagement and stickiness. They almost never present the coveted triple-threat. At the end of the day, media/brand partnerships are meant to serve as shortcuts on your chartered strategic course. If they do not translate into lower CPA/higher LTV, it means you’re probably lost (see #5).
3. Don’t say Sky! Sky Bet, now part of the Flutter group, rose to power in the UK while being part of the NewsCorp empire, and even then took a few years to hone and streamline its proposition. It is the exception, NOT the rule. The digital plains are now riddled with media/gaming corps (Fox Bet, MaximBet, fuboTV sportsbook, Barstool). It’s not to say it can’t be done (see TheScore in Ontario, Fanatics and ESPN Bet early days), but it has to be done out of a shared strategic view and alignment of interests (see #5 again…)
4. Keep your eyes on the road: although some pundits claim to have seen SIsportsbook’s fate from the outset, it’s still hindsight and still 20/20 when you only look at a singular event. Business Development is always forward looking and always contextual. For us the SI partnership was a milestone in a road beginning in 2009, stretching through 2013 then 2018… we could have gone right instead of left at every junction. Hindsight’s only value is if you project it forward. Otherwise, it’s a post on LI 😊
5. Strategy eats Opportunity for breakfast: speaking of the road, you have to make sure you’re driving on one… opportunities come and go, they often have real or made-up clocks ticking on them. But striking any strategic deal/partnership under the “let’s just do it and figure it out later” motto turns it into a lottery card, with similar win chances. When kicking the can, you’ll find the road is much shorter than expected.
Hope this is helpful and doesn’t get folded into a fortune cookie, but if it does – let’s hope it’s a branded one!
🚨 888holdings announces strategic review of US B2C operations - considering sale
👉 CEO Per Widerström expects to update at the end of March 2024
👉 US profit margin is lower than the wider group
👉 Also ending partnership with Sports Illustrated
https://lnkd.in/evrVcMEf
888 mulls US B2C sale as strategic review launches
igamingbusiness.com
VP R&D at Unispectral
2yבהצלחה איש יקר! אתם חוזרים לארץ?