Breaking News

ONS Data reveals the Fully Vaccinated are 6 times more likely to die than the Unvaccinated due to all-causes

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Raw Covid-19 Mortality and All Cause Mortality Data from the UK Office of National Statistics (ONS) has revealed that double vaccinated people were six times more likely to die of All Causes than unvaccinated people from the end of April to the beginning of July 2021.

This is the first time the government has published data which traps the scale of the lethal side effects of the Covid-19 injections.


By a concerned reader


The data can be downloaded from the ONS in Excel format here.

data is used from…
Table 4: Weekly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for deaths involving COVID-19, per 100,000 people, England, deaths occurring between 2 January 2021 and 2 July 2021
Table 5: Weekly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for non COVID-19 deaths, per 100,000 people, England, deaths occurring between 2 January 2021 and 2 July 2021
Death Factor = ratio of Vaccinated deaths per 100k against Unvaccinated deaths per 100k

In table 4 and 5 of the report, the ONS calculated the death rates per 100k using the complicated age standardised mortality rate formula explained in their report.

This is supposed to remove age as a confounding factor in the table above, but they do not supply the raw data by age band for the age bands they use in their formula. So one cannot check vital aspects of the formula.

Therefore a decision was made to just to use the raw data published above and calculate the death rates per 100k by dividing the death numbers by the population and multiplying by 100,000. We used excel for the calculation since the ONS supplies all the data in excel format.

For the avoidance of doubt –

The Unvaccinated Covid Deaths per 100k in Column11 = 100,000 x Column3/Column6
The Unvaccinated All Cause Deaths per 100k in Column14 = 100,000 x Column5/Column6

The Vaccinated Covid Deaths per 100k in Column 12 = 100,000 x Column7/Column10
The Vaccinated All Cause Deaths per 100k in Column 15 = 100,000 x Column9/Column10

The Vaccine Efficiency as measured by Covid-19 deaths is Column13 = (Column11 – Column12)/the larger of the two columns  as a %
The Vaccine Efficiency as measured by all cause deaths is Column16 = (Column14 – Column15)/the larger of the two columns  as a %
The Death Factor is simply the ratio of the Vaccinated all cause death rate per 100k to the Unvaccinated


The figures are astonishingly revealing.  Using the normalised absolute ratio of Covid deaths between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated in column 13 we see clearly that the vaccines were initially 97% effective against the alleged original Covid-19 variant as claimed by Pfizer and Moderna.

But by April their effectiveness in preventing Covid deaths had all but vanished from the raw data, being hidden to some extent by the age differential between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. Thereafter, thankfully, the death numbers (from Covid itself) have been pretty low both for the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. So all we see is noise around the zero.

There is perhaps a slight discernable advantage to the vaccines as the age differential runs out towards July. However nothing spectacular is seen there.

But when we look at all cause mortality we at last get some idea of the damage done by the gene therapy aspect of these injections.

The overall death rates among the double vaccinated per 100k were around 6 x higher than in the unvaccinated from the end of April until the start of July 2021. These death rates include all the deaths caused by side effects which have not necessarily been clinically attributed to the vaccines.

This is the first data published that manages to capture that figure. During the start of that period it is true that double vaccinated people were on average a lot older than unvaccinated people. So the death rates would be expected to be higher in the vaccinated group.

But all adults in the UK over 18 were called for their first shot by June 18th, at which time the recommended period between shots had been reduced to 8 weeks. So all adults had been called for a 2nd shot by August 13th. So by the end of September the age differential between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated would have been negligible.

But if we extrapolate the non age adjusted death factor figures forward by 12 weeks to September 24th (week 38), they will plainly still be very much in the red and certainly be above 3.

By week 26, 71% of the total population was double vaccinated. So most of the job was done, given that 8-9% are never going to be vaccinated  So this data drives a coach and horses through the concept that vaccines save lives. They do not. Quite the reverse in fact. They make people more likely to be infected with delta and more likely to die.

A further analysis of this data has been performed by Profs Norman Fenton and Martin Neil and can be viewed here.

Share this page to Telegram
4.3 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
53 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
davide
davide
2 years ago

very interesting data analysis. well done.
Using the ESP mortality rate formula of 2013 is quite blurry.
if the governement wants to separate different age groups, then share the raw original data. (but they are able to falsify them too)
At least they could implement the excel data with the overall mortality rate not age-weighed . but being a such bad data for their purposes, they show totally lack of transparency

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  davide
2 years ago

I just sent a Freedom of Information request to the ONS to give me the age groups (i) and the data that they are hiding from us. I am sure that data clearly show that at least for some age groups the vaccines are killing more people (from all causes) than the placebo group who resisted the jab

Last edited 2 years ago by Lords Witnesses
Dylan Jones
Dylan Jones
2 years ago

I posted information on this ONS data on 17th September. I also included a graph compiled by a twitter user pertaining to total deaths in vaccinated versus unvaccinated and Covid related deaths in vaccinated versus unvaccinated.

Note how keeping all eyes on delta, makes it appear that there is little difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. This is due to the distorted testing protocols for covid 19 heavily weighted against unvaccinated patients and the use of the fraudulent 40+ PCR cycle thresholds.

Most heinous of all, the official bodies are also counting vaccinated people who get ill within 14 days as unvaccinated. Those vaccinated admitted to hospital within that time frame will be tested and, if positive (very likely at 40+ cycles), will be counted as unvaccinated delta cases/deaths, simultaneously reducing the number of vaccinated delta cases/deaths.

This means there will be far greater numbers of vaccinated people in the intensive care wards who haven’t been tested or have been tested at lower PCR rates. Among these are the ones that die from the “short illness“. But they never show up because all eyes are on delta.

That is unprecedented fraud. And it won’t get onto MHRA VAERS, etc. Although it is revealed in the ONS data on excess mortality.

More than fraud.

Murder One…

https://bakerstreetrising.home.blog/2021/09/17/and-if-you-go-chasing-rabbits-and-you-know-youre-going-to-fall-update-september-18th/

Civilization-Hoax.com
Civilization-Hoax.com
Reply to  Dylan Jones
2 years ago

Lots of claims about vaccinated people PCR Ct higher than unvaxxed but the original source doc doesn’t say that.
Pls make sure to verify claims especially really wild ones like this that are so easy to check.

Gigolo Joe
Gigolo Joe
Reply to  Civilization-Hoax.com
2 years ago

It’s not exactly untrue, it’s just not official. CDC recommends “≤28 cycles” for the vaxed, whereas they otherwise routinely use up to 40 cycles. Fauci himself has suggested 35 as the cutoff, but you don’t have to look too hard to find labs admitting to using higher Ct’s. They have since removed the incriminating document from their website. “CDC Quietly Deletes Guidance Virally Criticized as Double Standard Higher Test Threshold for Reporting ‘Breakthrough’ Cases” https://newsrescue.com/cdc-quietly-deletes-guidance-virally-criticized-as-double-standard-for-reporting-breakthrough-cases/

Ibmekon
Ibmekon
2 years ago

The trick of , “If you die the day after the jab, we call it cov2 and count it as an unvaxed death” is not a one trick pony.
It is done after the 2nd jab too..
It shows in the early stats for the first dose, but not in the second….so the real figures are much worse than presented. IMHO

Dylan Jones
Dylan Jones
Reply to  Ibmekon
2 years ago

There’s another trick.

Vaccinated patients are not being routinely tested as are unvaccinated patients. Therefore, with a PCR test of 40 cycles and above yielding a 97% false positive rate, there will be far more unvaccinated in the original samples before determining and comparing cases and deaths amongst the two cohorts.

In all the cherry-picked studies they never disclose the proportions of those vaccinated versus unvaccinated in the original test sample BEFORE obtaining positive or negative results.

This is crucial data. Let’s say they sample 100,000 people. If 90,000 of those samples are unvaccinated and 10,000 vaccinated there is going to be a huge distortion in the statistics.

They never state that they tested x number of vaccinated people to get y number of positives in vaccinated people and x number of unvaccinated people to get y number of positives in unvaccinated people. y/x for vaccinated versus y/x unvaccinated is all important here but they only look at y vaccinated versus y unvaccinated.

Ibmekon
Ibmekon
Reply to  Dylan Jones
2 years ago

Correct.
I want to say to the people “Look, the Emperor is not wearing any clothes ! ”
40 years writing software has taught me to KISS – “keep it simple, stupid” when explaining statistics.
My posts are for general benefit – I hope !

WindUpRubberFinger(dot)com
WindUpRubberFinger(dot)com
Reply to  Ibmekon
2 years ago

They just do like Fauci. They claim, “We don’t have any data that suggests…” They don’t have the data, because they are not recording it. Because they are not concerned with how many people are killed or maimed by the vaccines.

There can only be one reason for this, and it’s not money. Following the money will only get you part of the way there.

The motivation behind this is much more involved than just money.

Ibmekon
Ibmekon
2 years ago

The cov2 plan.
DAY ONE.
Take all the sick old people being treated in hospital. Move them to under staffed, over crowded retirement homes, where they get no treatment and get cov2 infected.
A large number, sometimes 1/3rd to 1/2 of all residents are dead in a month.
All counted unvaxed deaths.
Now vax the remainder – boy do your stats look good for the period. A high percentage of unvaxed deaths and low percentage of vaxxed deaths. Done in USA, UK in sync.
Simples !

Sol
Sol
2 years ago

If you got vaxed, consider to ask your doctor if you can take this simple homeopathic remedies to flush out the toxins.
Silicea and Thuja c12.
Good luck.
https://mywisdom.substack.com/

trackback
2 years ago

[…] October 27, 2021ONS Data reveals the Fully Vaccinated are 6 times more likely to die than the Unvaccinated due to al… […]

Jesse
Jesse
2 years ago

Age adjustment is absolutely imperative to get any idea of what’s going on.
The million of children who don’t die heavily skew the results in favor of the unvaccinated.

Nikolaj
Nikolaj
Reply to  Jesse
2 years ago

Agreed. This article is plain ignorant. You can not simply disregard age. Obviously, more old people (vaccinated or not) is going to die compared to young people/kids (primarily unvaccinated).

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Jesse
2 years ago

A very valid point. I have sent an FOI request to the relevant ONS person for the age stratified data – which they obviously have or they could not use the formula. But how about this?
There were 33.42m double vaxxed on July2
There were 45.14m single vaxxed on July2
There are 53.282 million people over 18 in the UK
There were therefore 8.145m unvaxxed over 18 on July2
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/vaccinations (figures are for over 18)

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationprojections/datasets/tablea21principalprojectionukpopulationinagegroups (projection from 2018 for population in thousands
0-5  3737
5-9  4136
10-14 4128
15-17 2248 (60% of 15-19 figure)
15-19 3746
0-120 67531
18-120 53282 (by subtraction)

The ONS has data for 23.31m double vaxxed on July2 which is 69.7% of 33.42m
The ONS has data for 9.531m unvaxxed on July2 which is 117% of 8.145m

So lets assume the 10-18 year olds make up the difference in the 2 percentages. Then over 18 unavxxed population is 69.7% of 8.145m = 5.68m

So there are 3.85m kids from 10-18 in the unvaxxed data which need to be removed. Having done that the max death factor in week18 is 5.97 and the week 26 factor is 3.32 when 5.68m over 18s remain unvaxxed.
The unvaaxed group continues to decline to 4.582m on September24 69.7% of which is 3.193m. It does this not linearly, but exponentially as it asymptotically approaches the final unvaxxed figure (at which point there will be no placebo group left to do any science with). So if we take the fall off as continuing exponentially, then it halves every 9 weeks and week 36 will be 1.66 and week 38 will be 1.4. But this discounts the fall off in vaccine ‘efficacy’ which is nothing of the sort but is a progressive immune system degradation and only begins to kick in around 2-3 months after vaccination. So after July really. So I suspect 2.0 would be more accurate.

That would mean that half the deaths in the country are being caused by the vaccines.

Last edited 2 years ago by Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
2 years ago

If you look at the death rates in England and Wales compared to the 5 year average. That is the simplest way to determine if vaccines are saving or taking lives, because nearly everyone is now vaccinated. These show a 13.9% elevation compared to the 5 year average. So it is not the case that half the deaths in the country are being caused by the vaccines. But it is the case that in all cause terms, they are increasing the death rates, in Week41 by 1366 people (6.1% of the deaths were due to COVID in Week41). So the vaccines are killing more people than cancer which kills around 1050 per week. It is certainly not the case that today, they are saving lives (in all cause terms).
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/15october2021

Last edited 2 years ago by Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
2 years ago

The real question I am left with is why on earth did the ONS put in millions 10-18 year olds in th unavvaxed figures who ae not represented in the vaxxed figures and then use a complicated age standardisation formula to take them back out again? Surely the thing to do would have been to exclude them in the first place, then we could all see what was going one without the need for a complicated formula of dubious relevance. The only conclusion I can draw is they are hiding the true comparison, which means that comparison does not support the govt position that vaccines are safe.

Paul Prichard
Paul Prichard
2 years ago

Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2021-10-27. Harshbarger’s Natural Immunity Is Real Act. Social control costs lives. Build Back Better Billionaires
https://paulthepaperbear.wordpress.com/2021/10/27/your-alternative-update-on-covid19-for-2021-10-27-harshbargers-natural-immunity-is-real-act-social-control-costs-lives-build-back-better-billionaires/

trackback
2 years ago

[…] October 27, 2021ONS Data reveals the Fully Vaccinated are 6 times more likely to die than the Unvaccinated due to al… […]

Jeeby
Jeeby
2 years ago

Thank you for your amazing work!

Could you please consider adding a function on all of your articles to download the full articles as a PDF?

I would like to save them incase anything happens to your website in the future. These articles are important!

trackback
2 years ago

[…] October 27, 2021ONS Data reveals the Fully Vaccinated are 6 times more likely to die than the Unvaccinated due to al… […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] And a study conducted by Professor Norman Fenton and Professor Martin Neil concluded that the all-cause mortality death rate is currently higher among the “vaccinated” than the “unvaccinated.”  In fact, ONS data indicates those who have had Covid injections are six times more likely to die. […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] And an investigation conducted by Professor Norman Fenton and Professor Martin Neil concluded that the all-cause mortality death rate is currently higher among the “vaccinated” than the “unvaccinated.”  In fact, ONS data indicates those who have had Covid injections are six times more likely to die. […]

Jammez
Jammez
2 years ago

Interesting piece pity it was undermined by a ludicrous last sentence – “die from the delta” unless you’re quoting John o’looney who says in the undertaking world delta is their term for dieing from adverse reactions.

trackback
2 years ago

[…] Read more: Official data reveals the fully fake vaccinated are 6 times more likely to die than the un-fake-vacc… […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] ONS Data reveals the Fully Vaccinated are 6 times more likely to die than the Unvaccinated due to all-causes (link). […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] media and conspiracy spheres this has been harped on since the very beginning, but finally we have a meta-analysis by a major country providing us with data to confirm our suspicions:“Raw Covid-19 Mortality and All Cause Mortality Data from the UK Office of National […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] media and conspiracy spheres this has been harped on since the very beginning, but finally we have a meta-analysis by a major country providing us with data to confirm our suspicions:“Raw Covid-19 Mortality and All Cause Mortality Data from the UK Office of National […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] recent articles here and here from the UK presented an analysis of data from the UK system that suggested for some age […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] The death rates suffer from age bias. That is the cause of the hill shaped rather than linear profile of their graph. Immunologically one would expect the true behaviour, with the confounding factor of age removed, to vary linearly with vaccination percentage. It should go down if vaccines work and go up if they do not. Plainly they do not. The all cause mortality rates will be even worse for the vaccinated due to deaths not from Covid, but from vaccine side effects such as coagulopathy, and increased viral susceptibility. The Office of National Statistics in the UK (ONS) produces all cause mortality figures by vaccination status. which in their raw form have higher death rates in the vaccinated than they do in the unvaccinated – see here.  […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] The all cause mortality rates will be even worse for the vaccinated due to deaths not from Covid, but from vaccine side effects such as coagulopathy, and increased viral susceptibility. The Office of National Statistics in the UK (ONS) produces all cause mortality figures by vaccination status. which in their raw form have higher death rates in the vaccinated than they do in the unvaccinated – see here.  […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] The death rates suffer from age bias. That is the cause of the hill shaped rather than linear profile of their graph. Immunologically one would expect the true behaviour, with the confounding factor of age removed, to vary linearly with vaccination percentage. It should go down if vaccines work and go up if they do not. Plainly they do not.The all cause mortality rates will be even worse for the vaccinated due to deaths not from Covid, but from vaccine side effects such as coagulopathy, and increased viral susceptibility. The Office of National Statistics in the UK (ONS) produces all cause mortality figures by vaccination status. which in their raw form have higher death rates in the vaccinated than they do in the unvaccinated – see here.  […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] The all-cause mortality rates will be even worse for the vaccinated due to deaths not from Covid, but from vaccine side effects such as coagulopathy, and increased viral susceptibility. The Office of National Statistics in the UK (ONS) produces all-cause mortality figures by vaccination status. which in their raw form have higher death rates in the vaccinated than they do in the unvaccinated – see here. […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] The all-cause mortality rates will be even worse for the vaccinated due to deaths not from Covid, but from vaccine side effects such as coagulopathy, and increased viral susceptibility. The Office of National Statistics in the UK (ONS) produces all-cause mortality figures by vaccination status. which in their raw form have higher death rates in the vaccinated than they do in the unvaccinated – see here. […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] The all-cause mortality rates will be even worse for the vaccinated due to deaths not from Covid, but from vaccine side effects such as coagulopathy, and increased viral susceptibility. The Office of National Statistics in the UK (ONS) produces all-cause mortality figures by vaccination status. which in their raw form have higher death rates in the vaccinated than they do in the unvaccinated – see here. […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] recent articles here and here from the UK presented an analysis of data from the UK system that suggested for some age […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] following comes from The Expose. There is a lot of room for error here but it is an anomaly reported by Alex Berenson as […]

Maggie Zhou
Maggie Zhou
2 years ago

This article unfortunately misinterpreted data by using raw death numbers rather than the “age-standardized mortality rates” provided in the official tables (Table 4 for COVID deaths and Table 5 for non-COVID deaths).

So instead of adding up the two types of death numbers, then dividing by population size of each vaccination category, what should have been done is to add up the “age-standardized mortality rate” of the two types of deaths, to obtain the all-cause mortality rate for each vaccination category.

Otherwise, the all-cause mortality rate as calculated in this article, is NOT age-standardized, therefore can NOT be directly compared between different vaccination status, or even between different weeks, since the population composition changes as more and more people got vaccinated.

The proper comparison was done in an earlier article by Professor Norman Fenton & Professor Martin Neil, which was also reposted on this website:
https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/26/the-uk-governments-own-data-does-not-support-the-claims-made-for-covid-19-vaccine-safety-effectiveness/

They have since then published an updated article, highlighting the many errors and inconsistencies in the officially released statistics:
https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/10/comparing-all-cause-mortality-rate-by.html

Maggie Zhou
Maggie Zhou
Reply to  Maggie Zhou
2 years ago

What professors Fenton & Neil found was that the age-standardized all-cause mortality rates of the single-jabbed categories have risen after the first few weeks since January 2021, and have remained much higher than the unvaccinated, but that the double-jabbed all-cause mortality remains lower than the unjabbed.

I believe it’s because the first dose caused a lot of the more vulnerable to become sick enough they didn’t get the second jab. So the single jabbed dies at a much higher rate, while the double jabbed at a lower rate because they’re overall sturdier to begin with (but the boosters will eventually knock them down too.

For more details, see my comment here:
https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/09/all-cause-mortality-rates-in-england.html?showComment=1636696046024#c518931317286254456

trackback
2 years ago

[…] prove a causal connection between vaccination and mortality, but they merit concern. See also this and this analysis of UK mortality data that seems to show all-cause mortality to be higher in the […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] prove a causal connection between vaccination and mortality, but they merit concern. See also this and this analysis of UK mortality data that seems to show all-cause mortality to be higher in the […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] prove a causal connection between vaccination and mortality, but they merit concern. See also this and this analysis of UK mortality data that seems to show all-cause mortality to be higher in the […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] prove a causal connection between vaccination and mortality, but they merit concern. See also this and this analysis of UK mortality data that seems to show all-cause mortality to be higher in the […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] prove a causal connection between vaccination and mortality, but they merit concern. See also this and this analysis of UK mortality data that seems to show all-cause mortality to be higher in the […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] Zusammenhang zwischen Impfung und Sterblichkeit, aber sie geben Anlass zur Besorgnis. Siehe auch diese und diese Analyse britischer Mortalitätsdaten, die zu zeigen scheint, dass die Gesamtmortalität […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] prove a causal connection between vaccination and mortality, but they merit concern. See also this and this analysis of UK mortality data that seems to show all-cause mortality to be higher in the […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] prove a causal connection between vaccination and mortality, but they merit concern. See also this and this analysis of UK mortality data that seems to show all-cause mortality to be higher in […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] prove a causal connection between vaccination and mortality, but they merit concern. See also this and this analysis of UK mortality data that seems to show all-cause mortality to be higher in the […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] The all cause mortality rates will be even worse for the vaccinated due to deaths not from Covid, but from vaccine side effects such as coagulopathy, and increased viral susceptibility. The Office of National Statistics in the UK (ONS) produces all cause mortality figures by vaccination status. which in their raw form have higher death rates in the vaccinated than they do in the unvaccinated – see here.  […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] Recent data from the U.K. Office of National Statistics reveals people who have been double jabbed against COVID-19 are d… […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] Recent data from the U.K. Office of National Statistics reveals people who have been double jabbed against COVID-19 are d… […]