Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
DMED Is a Game-changer on Vaccine Safety
On Monday, Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) held a panel discussion on vaccine safety (see Second Opinion). During this hearing we learned about some DOD whistleblowers that revealed alarming data on vaccine safety. These protected whistleblowers shared data from the DMED and it is a game-changer.
DMED is the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database. DMED was created to track every illness of military members from an epidemiological standpoint for the purpose of diagnosing any adverse health trend that could affect military readiness. It is accurate, complete and designed for early detection of issues in the military population.
Daniel Horowitz has been working with the whistleblowers to get the word out. From the data (and there is a *lot* of data) it looks 2020 (year 1 of Covid) was like the previous 4 years and 2021 (year 1 of vaccines) shows alarming upticks in medical problems. The whistleblowers went public, because their commanders ignored the issue. Here are some findings from Daniel:
In a declaration under penalty of perjury that Renz plans to use in federal court, Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long — three military doctors — revealed that there has been a 300% increase in DMED codes registered for miscarriages in the military in 2021 over the five-year average. The five-year average was 1,499 codes for miscarriages per year. During the first 10 months of 2021, it was 4,182.
Aside from the spike in miscarriage diagnoses (ICD code O03 for spontaneous abortions), there was an almost 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (from a five-year average of 38,700 per year to 114,645 in the first 11 months of 2021). There was also a 1,000% increase in diagnosis codes for neurological issues, which increased from a baseline average of 82,000 to 863,000!
Some other numbers he did not mention at the hearing but gave to me in the interview are the following:
- myocardial infarction –269% increase
- Bell’s palsy – 291% increase
- congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase
- female infertility – 471% increase
- pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase
These findings from the best epidemiological database in the world are enough to make me conclude that the Covid Vaccines are unsafe for military age people until Pfizer/Moderna can provide better data. Given a choice between great data from the US military and redacted data from Big Pharma, I’ll choose the great data.
Published in Military
May a million lawsuits bloom!
And a few courts martial. The mass vaccination of our military has been worrisome but this data is devastating.
Remember, there’s never been a point in history where the censors have been the good guys.
They’re safe and effective DonG, and get out of here with your “data” and “epidemiological databases” and “whistleblowers” and testimony and look at all the Big Pharma funded studies I’ve got to show you…
Sorry, I was just standing in until you know who gets here.
Do you have a link to the data?
The link to the Horowitz article is in the OP but here it is again. https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-whistleblowers-share-dod-medical-data-that-blows-vaccine-safety-debate-wide-open
It appears that full DMED has not been released. You will note that Senator Johnson has put the DOD on notice that their data is to be preserved, which is noteworthy in itself.
I had already read the article, but such articles seldom are written by people who know how to look at data. And it didn’t really present the data, only a few summaries that purport to be based on the data. I’m interested in a link to the data (or better yet, an article that gives a more detailed analysis of the data).
If the data have not been released, that would explain why we still don’t know anything. I hope the data are preserved and analyzed so we can find out how important they are and what to make of all this.
I too would like to see this in a more analytic context.
I suspect that in most medical, academic, and government environments, reporting anything adverse about the vaccines is heavily discouraged. I also have zero confidence in the integrity of people in federal agencies to tell us anything contrary to whatever narrative they are committed to defending at any given moment. But having said that, it does not mean that I have to accept anecdotal reports that happen to jibe with my suspicions. I hope this can be pinned down.
It is very encouraging that the data is based on ICD codes over a long period of time. These may or may not tell us why the data is changing so much but if the whistleblowers are correct we certainly need to find the cause.
Horowitz said that the 5 years of baseline was from the last time the redid the codes. We are lucky the didn’t choose to revamp the codes last year.
I don’t see one in the articles, but I will keep looking. I will say that the lawyer that testified (Thomas Renz) has a dodgy 1990’s looking website. I hope he is not the Covid Sidney Powell.
According to Tom Renz’s statements earlier today over on RedVoiceMedia, the main data base that he relied on, Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, has been taken down.
Whether that is because too many people visited the site due to the fact Renz’s testimony before the Johnson hearing has gone viral and so then the site was overwhelmed, or due to some more sinister reason, I couldn’t say.
While talking to Stew Peters, he mentions that if there is a sinister reason for the removal of he database, those who took down the database need to realize he has copies of every pixel of information – multi copies scattered across the country.
Full interview:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/01/military-vax-data-rocks-dc-catastrophic-injury-toll-exposed-at-sen-johnson-hearing/?utm_source=right-rail-trending
It is inside the hearing that was video’ed that I offered up to you yesterday, the hearing Republican Ron Johnson held on the 24th of January.
Maybe someone knows the time mark where Renz’s testimony comes in at so you don’t have to watch the entire 5 hour program.
Or maybe someone here has a working clip of Renz’s testimony in stand alone form. I have not found a clip I can transfer to here, that doesn’t require a GAB, twitter or FB account.
Mere coincidence. Trust me.
I found a website that broke up the 5 hours into various speakers. The site also has the full five hours:
https://dailystormer.su/most-powerful-anti-vax-presentation-yet-senate-hearing-on-deadly-vaccines/
If you scroll down once on that webpage, you will find Renz right after Dr Bhattacharya.
The raw data Renz used on which to base his testimony is down right now, I believe. It could be the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database was overwhelmed once the testimony went viral and then the DMED was too swamped to stay up.
What is really needed is not only time-series data, but a specific comparison of the population that has had the vaccines versus the population that has not had the vaccines…stratified by age. This should be easy to create from the data IF the individual records show vaxxed/unvaxxed status…don’t know if they do, though.
Ooo. Very wise, but seldom done.
Exactly. Many of these symptoms/maladies are also consequences of COVID infections.
Read the WaPo profile on Renz. He’s the source for a lot of claims about a lot of stuff, sourced to whistleblowers no one can talk to. He’s also part of ForGodCountryFamily.org, which doesn’t appear grifty at all, no sir.
Wait a minute, Stew Peters? The bounty hunter? The guy who called the hospital that kept a COVID patient on a ventilator for two and half months Satanic torturers?
Well who can say if they’re Satanic but the doctor who finally took over his care is adamant that had the first hospital not put him on that ventilator and allowed him life saving drugs like Ivermectin instead of deadly ones like Remdesivir he’d still be alive. Just like a lot of others.
So yeah. Thank God for Stew Peters covering the stories others are trying to bury.
Because BezosWaPo is trustworthy and never a mouthpiece for inside the beltway grifters.
Problems derived from clotting might overlap, but increased incidence of cancer?
Correlation is not causation! Base on those numbers of increases deaths and complications, hospitals should be overwhelmed not with Covid patients but with Any number of other illnesses. I’m very skeptical of the report.
The WaPo article is well done. It looks thorough and balanced and Renz does not look like the best of men. However, this stood out to me: Asked about his litigation experience and his role challenging coronavirus vaccines, Renz said in an email: “I sincerely wish that the big firms would step up but they have not so it is left to nobodies like me.”
The obvious reply is that no good firm will touch this because there is no good case to be made. But consider that such might be unwilling to attach themselves to something that is untouchable, much like climate change only worse. As thoroughly vaccinated Scottish physician Malcolm Kendrick complained in 2019: “It is clear that, in the medical profession, there is an unquestioned faith in vaccination. That is, all vaccinations, for all diseases, everywhere – for everyone. Anyone who dares to hint that, ahem, there could be some negative issues associated with vaccination is subjected to withering contempt. ‘You will be responsible for killing millions of children.’ You don’t understand science.’”
The good firms won’t touch defending those charged in the January 6 riot, either.
Doesn’t matter if he’s right.
Is he right?
I wondered about that and looked at a news report on OneAmerica Insurance Company’s announcement of a 40% increase in deaths among their insured customers aged 18-64 (2021 over 2020) in Indiana. Here is a statement from the head of the Indiana Hospital Association:
At the same news conference where Davison spoke, Brian Tabor, the president of the Indiana Hospital Association, said that hospitals across the state are being flooded with patients “with many different conditions,” saying “unfortunately, the average Hoosiers’ health has declined during the pandemic.”
In a follow-up call, he said he did not have a breakdown showing why so many people in the state are being hospitalized – for what conditions or ailments. But he said the extraordinarily high death rate quoted by Davison matched what hospitals in the state are seeing.
Also, Washington Post? C’mon, James. You might as well be referencing Weekly World News. At this point in history, anyone who seriously accepts the Washington Post as a source should be laughed at long and loud.
I’ll begin:
There is not much reason for heavyweight plaintiff firms to try to go after the vaccine makers because the USA assumes all liability for vaccination injuries. There are no punitive dames, no big pain and suffering awards nor any deep-dive potentially embarrassing discovery fights.
Going before a special board, filing in a fixed process under the Federal Tort Claims Act and the 1983 and 1986 vaccine legislation, resulting in formulaic outcomes (slowly generated) is not attractive to most personal injury lawyers.
It takes a lot to get around those blanket protections for the vaccine makers. From the statute summary
So, for the heavy hitters in the plaintiffs’ bar to get involved there would have to be (a) some really serious, debilitating injuries (a bout of mild myocarditis with no lasting injury is not a big dollar item) AND (b) some smoking-gun evidence that Big Pharma knowingly screwed the pooch on manufacturing quality and/or knew about some horrific effects but acted to hush it up.
Even if it turns out that there is some long-term autoimmune conditions caused by the vaccines, Big Pharma is in the clear unless it can be proven they knew it would happen and actively concealed that info.
I don’t think there’s enough information about the patients to glean much from the report, and there’s a lot we don’t know about the virus or vaccines yet. But the findings are pretty serious, I think.
I hope it is enough to end the mandate idea forever. I think reasonable doubts and concerns and questions about these vaccines should be enough to take the mandates to court and put an end to them. There’s no time to wait for the research labs to study this. A decision on risk has to be made now, and this makes the vaccines look too risky.
I wonder why the military is allowing these doctors to speak after what they did to Lt. Col. Scheller.