You are on page 1of 2
CASE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Printed: 04/23/2021 11:10 NOT SUPERVISOR APPROVED OCA: 2103010231 THE INFORMATION BELOW IS CONFIDENTIAL - FOR USE BY AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY oie Dae Tine: 04/2/2021 074450, Priday Dpers (0) Supensor Review Date/Time: NOT REVIEWED Conte Referens: Canvas [04 INVESTIGATIVE MATTER TO BE CLOSED OUT. THIS SECTION HAS SPENT AT MINIMUM 200 PLUS MAN HOURS INVESTIGATING THIS MATTER. INITIALLY THIS MATTER WAS INVESTIGATED AS A MALICIOUS MISCHIEF AND POSSIBLE MDP INCIDENT IN THE DORMS. FURTHER INVE:! IGATION REVEALED THAT A LARCENY ALSO OCCURRED. THIS WAS UNCOV ERED SUBSEQUENT TO OUR, INITIAL INTERVIEW WITH THE COMPLAINANT. ALTHOUGH NO PERPETRATOR WAS IDENTIFIED A FEW POTENTIAL SUSPECTS WERE UNCOVERED, INCLUDING THE COMPLAINANT [BB Xk NowN/UNNAMED GIRLFRIEND OR BOYFRIEND. IININIHREFUSES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION). THERFFORE, AFTER SPENDING A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF RESOURCES INVESTIGATING THIS MATTER, WHICH INCLUDED CANVASSING, LOCATING & INTERVIEWING WITNESSES. THERE ARE A FEW CONCLUSIONS THE PROCURED EVIDENCE ALBEIT CIRCUMSTANTIAL HAS LED US. 1. NO EYEWITNESSES HAVE COME FORWARD AND ARE PROBABLY NON-EXISTENT, DESPIT REW 2. THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO INDICATORS OF ANY RACIAL INTENT. THIS IS A DIFFICULT BURDEN OF PROOF EVEN WITH IDENTIFIED PERPETRATORS. 3.THE COMPLAINANT HAS MADE MANY ENEMIES ON CAMPUS. NONE HAVE TO DO WITH RACE OR SEXUAL IDENTITY (PRIMARY COMPLAINT INVOLVE DOG) IN FACT, THE VICTIM HAS EMBEDDED] W:THIN ORGANIZATIONS THAT PROVIDE SUPPORT AND ADVOCATE Il LIFESTYLE CHOICES. IRONICALLY, OUR INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THESE ARE THE SAME PEERS QUESTIONING IURUTHFULNESS ABOUT THE REPORTED INCIDENT 4. ADDITIONALLY, THE COMPLAINANT'S MOTIVATION TO BREAK lease Because orfpos AND AMBITION T0 BECOME AN OFFICER IN THE BSU ALTHOUGH SPECULATIVE ISN'T EASIE DISMISSED AND PROVIDE A GREAT AMOUNT OF MOTIVATION TO MAKE A FALSE REPORT. THIS IS EVEN MORE IMPORTANT WHEN THIS THEORY I8 SUPPORTED BY MEMBERS FROM THE SAME ORGANIZATION (SU) Investigator Signatures Page 1 CASE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Printed: 04/23/2021 11:10 NOT SUPERVISOR APPROVED A: 2103010231 y [Dif INFORMATION BELOW IS CONPIDENTIAL - FOR USE BY AUTHORIZED FERSONNEL ONLY Supervisor: (0) Supervisor Review Date/Time: NOT REVIEWED 07-44:50, Frida Contact Reference: Canvass F PARTY WITNESS TESTIMONY, SPECIFICALLY FROME FRIEND ISIS IMPLICATES RRR AND CONKNOWn) GIRLFRIEND AS THE CULPRITS. HOWEVER, AT THIS TIME ISIS ISNT COMPELLED TO SPEAK WITH POLICE OR WSU ADMINISTRATION DESPITE THE FACT ‘THE ISIS IS A WSU EMPLOYEE AND HOLDS SOME OBLIGATION TO REPORT SUCH CONCERNS UNFORTUNATELY, ISIS HAS ONLY CHOSEN TO SHARE THIS INFORMATION WITH A SELECT CLOSE FRIENDS WHO IN TURN SHARED THE INFORMATION WITH POLICE INVESTIGATORS BBB + 4s \csvranven tHe same position BY REFUSING TO IDENTIFY THIS UNKNOWN GIRLFRIND OR SPEAK FURTHER WITH POLICE [REE HOULD BE BROUGHT TO TASK TO ANSWER THESE NEW FOUND ALLEGATIONS. HOWEVER, THE NEED TO TREAD LIGHTLY IS UNDERSTOOD. FROM A STRICTLY EVIDENTIARY PERSPECTIVE, MY CONCLUSION IS THAT THIS INCIDENT MOST LIKELY DIDN'T OCCUR AS NARRATED BY| CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN THE FORM OF WITNESS TESTIMONY SUGGEST OTHERWISE, THEREFORE, THE EVIDENCE CONCLUDES THAT ABSENT ANY DIRECT EVIDENCE ANY FURTHER TIME OR EFFORT EXPENDED ON THIS MATTER WOULD BEAR FRUITLES Investigator Signatu: Page 2

You might also like