Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Blue Origin to fly again as space tourism struggles to get off the ground

Why this company’s biggest fans turned against it

These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is real.

Would you eat this weird sandwich? Barry Enderwick would. 

She finished chemo then got a medical degree: ‘The dream is real now’

Puppy abandoned with heart-rending note is adopted, named Minerva

In photos: The 149th running of the Preakness Stakes

Book Tour: At home with Amor Towles

Gov. Doug Burgum speaks in support of Trump

‘Never Trump?’ ‘Never Biden’ voters might loom larger.

How Jim Jordan tried to connect the dots on Biden’s $8 million book deal

Lawyer preparation suggests Trump won’t testify in New York trial

Carolyn Hax: Friends say to break other plans to avoid offending new man

Ask Amy: Should my husband get a say in what I do with my inheritance?

Ask Amy: Can’t a single woman eat alone without interruption?

The problem with diversity statements — and what to do about them

Russia shows resilience. There is more to do for Ukraine.

Trump promises tax cuts and fewer rules. CEOs shouldn’t fall for it.

Kyle Finnegan’s rare hiccup helps Phillies to a 4-3 win in 10 innings

Joey Gallo returns, but Nats endure another quiet offensive night

Walter Johnson’s jersey from 1920 showdown with Babe Ruth sold at auction

The other side of Punta Cana: A crackdown on Haitians

Top White House aide to meet Netanyahu, who is under political pressure

Live updates: Rescuers struggle to find helicopter carrying Iranian president

Biden’s false claim that inflation was 9 percent when he took office

Did Obamacare ‘massively’ increase the cost of health care?

The world’s coolest hotels want to tell you a story

6 Airbnb red flags to spot before you make a booking mistake

Flying budget airlines might not be as cheap as it seems

Trump

Big Tech news and how to take control of your data and devices

See more coverage in your recommendations

Technology

Tips delivered to your inbox twice weekly

The Tech Friend newsletter

Business and Tech alerts

Andrew Harrer

Facebook tried to pass the buck on former president Donald Trump, but the buck got passed right back.

For several years, Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg has pushed the idea that he and his company shouldn’t be in the position of creating the rules of the road to govern the personal expression of billions of people. He went so far as to <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/05/03/facebook-trump-decision-faq/" target=_blank>dedicate $130 million</a> to fund an independent panel of outside experts to which the company could outsource the thorniest decisions about what types of content — and voices — should be allowed to stay up on Facebook.

When the company banned Trump on Jan. 6 for social media posts encouraging the mob that stormed the U.S. Capitol, Zuckerberg turned that hard decision over to that newly formed independent panel, the Oversight Board, for review, hoping it would make the final determination.

But on Wednesday, the 20-member panel punted the decision back to Facebook, recommending the company decide within six months whether to permanently ban or restore Trump’s account. He is currently suspended “indefinitely,” a one-off penalty outside Facebook’s usual rules.

The board, set up to act as a “Supreme Court-like” body to police Facebook’s content decisions, scolded the company for trying to pass it off, too.

“In applying a vague, standardless penalty and then referring this case to the Board to resolve, Facebook seeks to avoid its responsibilities,” the members wrote in a sharply worded ruling. “The Board declines Facebook’s request and insists that Facebook apply and justify a defined penalty.”

Facebook’s Oversight Board has decided the fate of Trump’s account. Here’s everything you need to know.

The <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/05/05/facebook-trump-decision/" target="_blank">long-awaited decision</a> by the board Wednesday was widely expected to settle Trump’s fate on the site, as well as provide guidance to other social media companies like YouTube that have also suspended Trump’s accounts. It was the first major test for the Oversight Board, which has been touted by some lawmakers and experts as a potential role model for future regulation and criticized by others as a way for Facebook to front-run the government by taking matters into its own hands.

Instead, those questions are pending. Nick Clegg, Facebook‘s vice president of global affairs and communications, said in a <a href="https://about.fb.com/news/2021/05/facebook-oversight-board-decision-trump/" target=_blank>blog post</a> Wednesday that it will “consider the board’s decision and determine an action that is clear and proportionate.” Because its recommendations that Facebook restore or block Trump permanently are nonbinding, it’s unclear whether the company will follow them.

Jonathan Baran

Some experts said the board made the right move by not allowing Facebook to shirk responsibility.

The board “is blowing the whistle on the company’s attempt to outsource responsibility for making this difficult and controversial decision,” said Paul Barrett, deputy director of the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights. “The board refused to play that deflection game and demanded that Facebook clarify its rules and follow them when deciding Trump’s long-term status on the platforms.”

Others said it was the board refusing to do its job.

Facebook’s Oversight Board upholds ban on Trump. At least for now.

“Their role is to constrain Facebook’s, and Mark Zuckerberg’s, discretion,” wrote Evelyn Douek, a Harvard Law School lecturer, in a <a href="https://www.lawfareblog.com/its-not-over-oversight-boards-trump-decision-just-start" target=_blank>Lawfare article</a> Wednesday. “The [Facebook Oversight Board] has declined to do that almost entirely, and did not even provide meaningful parameters of the policies it calls on Facebook to develop.”

Giving the final call on Trump back to Facebook is unlikely to result in the fair and even decision the board members are calling for, said Joan Donovan, a disinformation and extremism researcher at Harvard University.

“I can imagine that what ends up happening is very different from what the board imagined,” Donovan said. “The board completely dodged in the sense that if they were really on the side of society, if they were really on the side of the people, they would have suggested to Facebook that they should ban Donald Trump.”

Either way, the back-and-forth means the most complicated questions about the decision are left on the table. That includes how social media companies should draw the line between speech and violence or <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/05/04/trump-facebook-relationship-history/" target=_blank>moderate political figures</a> going forward.

The Board insists that Facebook review this matter to determine and justify a proportionate response that is consistent with the rules that are applied to other users of its platform. Facebook must complete its review of this matter within six months of the date of this decision. The Board also makes policy recommendations for Facebook to implement in developing clear, necessary, and proportionate policies that promote public safety and respect freedom of expression.

The board members took issue with the characterization that they were not fulfilling their mandate to oversee Facebook.

“I don’t think we’re just passing the buck back to Facebook here,” board co-chair and former Danish prime minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt said in a media call Wednesday. “What we are saying is, it can’t be left up to Facebook to just choose their own penalty for their users. They have to follow their own rules.”

Facebook and Trump are at a turning point in their long, tortured relationship

The decision that caused the rift was announced Wednesday after months of deliberation. Facebook‘s Oversight Board said it was <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/05/facebook-ban-trump-oversight-board-decision/" target=_blank>upholding</a> the company’s ban on Trump.

In the <a href="https://www.oversightboard.com/decision/FB-691QAMHJ">ruling</a>, the board agreed that Trump’s comments on the day of the Capitol insurrection “created an environment where a serious risk of violence was possible.” The board pointed to the president’s references to the rioters as “patriots” and “special,” and his instructions to “Remember this day forever.”

But it took issue with Facebook’s “indefinite” suspension of Trump, saying it was “vague and uncertain.” The board said Facebook’s rationale for the original ban was unprincipled and arbitrary, and that “indefinite” bans were not even written policy at the time the Trump decision was made.

When sending the case back to Facebook, the board recommended that the company come up with a better, clearer rationale for either banning or restoring Trump’s account.

Trump, for his part, said in a statement Wednesday that free speech was taken from him because “Radical Left Lunatics are afraid of the truth.”

Trump advisers viewed the Oversight Board decision as disappointing because it could hurt fundraising prospects going forward, said one adviser who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak freely about internal deliberations.

News of the decision was rare cause for optimism among Facebook’s workforce, which has been demoralized by the company’s many scandals and history of giving passes to Trump. Some employees praised the decision as “thoughtful and a step forward for this governance model” in the employee chat system, according to documents viewed by The Washington Post. Others posted hand-clapping emojis.

But there was also worry about the path forward. Some wished the Oversight Board had given more guidance and expressed concern about what would happen now that the decision had been kicked back to Facebook. Others pointed out that regular people had been permanently banned from FB for doing far worse things.

“I really hope this happens, and that it is done honestly and in the open,” one said.

The board’s decision was also seen as a possible bellwether for other social media companies. YouTube has also suspended Trump’s account indefinitely but says it could reinstate him when it judges the threat of him inciting political violence has abated. The Google-owned video site froze Trump’s channel after it uploaded videos of him doubling down on comments he had made to supporters before the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. Usually breaking YouTube’s rules for the first time results in a one-week suspension, but Trump’s account has been locked for about four months now.

Five things to know about Facebook's Trump ban

“At YouTube, we have long-established community guidelines that govern what can stay on our platform and apply to everyone,” said YouTube spokesperson Ivy Choi. “The Donald J. Trump channel violated our incitement-to-violence policy and was suspended in accordance with our three-strikes system.”

Trump wasn’t as active on YouTube as he was on Facebook and Twitter, but the video platform was a major part of his campaign’s advertising strategy. Trump bought millions of dollars’ worth of ads on YouTube throughout the election and secured the coveted homepage banner ad during the Democratic National Convention and the week leading up to the election.

Twitter, which got out of the business of political advertising before the 2020 election, banned Trump permanently after the Capitol insurrection.

Facebook is also a critical part of many political campaigns, offering a way for candidates to connect with potential voters and to raise funds.

“Twitter was probably a greater personal loss [to Trump], but Facebook is a more important professional loss,” said social media researcher and Clemson University professor Darren Linvill. “It’s central to any campaign.”

Zuckerberg first publicly floated the idea of creating the Oversight Board in 2018, just as lawmakers around the world were mulling ways to regulate the social network. Critics said the company lacked any accountability for its moderation decisions, from handling hate speech to how it applied its newsworthiness exemption to leaders like Trump. They said there were no checks on Zuckerberg’s power to determine what could be shared with billions of people. Each major decision could have wide-reaching social consequences, the kind that are regularly handled by laws and courts around the world. So Facebook decided to make its own court, outside of any existing legal system, staffed by paid experts and with no legal authority to force Facebook to change.

“You can imagine some sort of structure, almost like a Supreme Court, that is made up of independent folks who don’t work for Facebook, who ultimately make the final judgment call on what should be acceptable speech in a community that reflects the social norms and values of people all around the world,” Zuckerberg told Vox in a 2018 interview.

The actual board didn’t come together until last year. It started working on its first decision in the fall, its 20 members meeting over videoconference. Since late January, the board has heard 10 cases and ruled nine times, filing long legal-like documents that contain a binding ruling on whether to uphold a Facebook moderation decision, along with policy suggestions that Facebook can choose to implement or not. In six cases, it has gone against Facebook’s initial determination.

Samuel Woolley, an assistant professor and the director of a propaganda research team at the University of Texas at Austin, said Wednesday’s decision is further indication that the government needs to step in and regulate this space.

The board was right to insist on more transparency, he said.

“The board is essentially saying, ‘We can’t do our jobs if Facebook doesn’t have clear internal regulations, and we’re not going to be a scapegoat for Facebook’s decisions.’”

How Facebook wrote its rules to accommodate Trump.

Gerrit De Vynck, Rachel Lerman and Josh Dawsey contributed to this report.

Winner of the 2017 Overseas Press Club Bob Considine Award for "Behind the Firewall" Series on Silicon Valley China

 2010 Finalist, Livingston Award for Young Journalists

 2009 Finalist, Livingston Award for Young Journalists 

Columbia University, BA. 

Columbia Graduate School of Journalism, MS.

Lizza joined The Washington Post as Silicon Valley correspondent in 2016, becoming the paper's eyes and ears in the region. She focuses on social media and the power of the tech industry in a democratic society. Before that, she was the Wall Street Journal's first full-time beat reporter covering AI and the impact of algorithms on people's lives. 

Elizabeth Dwoskin

Northwestern University, BS in journalism

Cat Zakrzewski is a national technology policy reporter, tracking global efforts to regulate the tech industry. She focuses on AI policy and the battles over free speech online.

Cat Zakrzewski

New York University, BA in journalism

Heather Kelly is a San Francisco-based reporter covering the ways technology affects everyday life. 

Heather Kelly

washpost

Facebook’s attempt to outsource its Trump decision to the Oversight Board failed

the-washington-post

Facebook, Instagram Restrictions On Trump Accounts Extended

Bloomberg

Help Desk

Artificial Intelligence

Internet Culture

Space

Tech Policy

Tech

iptc-media/society

iptc-media/arts_culture_entertainment_and_media

iptc-media/politics/government

iptc-media/society/values

iptc-media/economy_business_and_finance/economic_sector/media

iptc-media/society/values/ethics

iptc-media/crime_law_and_justice

iptc-media/crime_law_and_justice/law

iptc-media/politics/political_process

iptc-media/politics/election

iptc-media/economy_business_and_finance

iptc-media/arts_culture_entertainment_and_media/mass_media/online_media

iptc-media/arts_culture_entertainment_and_media/mass_media

iptc-media/politics

client-blocklists/Client List: Morgan Stanley KWs - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/Amazon KWs - EXCLUDE ALL 

client-blocklists/Client List: Becton Dickinson KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/CLIENT LIST: Nomura KWs 2021 - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Boeing KWs 2021- INCLUDE ANY

client-blocklists/Client List: Exxon Mobil  - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/GEICO KWs - INCLUDES ANY_4.26.21

client-blocklists/Client List: Microsoft KWs 2 - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/Client List: T. Rowe Price KWs - INCLUDES ANY

advertising/B2_Academic & Professional Education_legacyaux_1o8

client-blocklists/T. Rowe Price KWs - INCLUDES ANY

advertising/B2_Apple Content_legacyaux_wxg

client-blocklists/HBO KWs - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/Client List: ExxonMobil 03312021 KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Ford/Lincoln KWs - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/Bank of America KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/WaPo: Combined Disaster Keyword List - INCLUDES ANY

advertising/Blackrock - Finance and Investing Content

advertising/B2_Business_legacyaux_hws

client-blocklists/Client List: Navy Federal Credit Union NFCU KWs 2 - EXCLUDES ALL - 12.23.20

advertising/B2_Career Development_legacyaux_feo

advertising/B2_Companies_legacyaux_ieb

advertising/B2_Congressional Elections_legacyaux_r48

client-blocklists/Blockist: Capitol Building Mob

client-blocklists/Client List: Eli Lily KWs - INCLUDES ANY

advertising/B2_Corporate Responsibility_legacyaux_FTM

advertising/B2_Culture and Tradition_legacyaux_kfx

client-blocklists/Client List: IBM KWs ALTERNATE Watson - EXCLUDES ALL

advertising/B2_Entrepreneurship_legacyaux_sqb

client-blocklists/Client List: Purina KWs - INCLUDES ANY

advertising/B2_Government & Policy_legacyaux_mza

advertising/B2_Health and Beauty_legacyaux_3fv

client-blocklists/BP KWs - INCLUDES ANY

advertising/B2_Democratic Conventions_legacyaux_oji

advertising/B2_Policy and Regulation_legacyaux_qe2

advertising/B2_Politically Active - DO NOT REMOVE_legacyaux_lmp

advertising/B2_Politics and Policy_legacyaux_pay

advertising/B2_Politics_legacyaux_8f3

advertising/B2_Positive News_legacyaux_hlt

advertising/B2_Science, Health & Technology_legacyaux_wkq

advertising/B2_Social Media_legacyaux_34n

advertising/B2_Society_legacyaux_0cz

advertising/B2_Tech_legacyaux_54y

advertising/B2_TV and Movies_legacyaux_vat

advertising/B2_Young Professional / International Businessman_legacyaux_r5x

client-blocklists/Client List: KPMG KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Client List: Navy Federal Credit Union NFCU KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Client List: Verizon KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Client List: Novo Nordisk KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Client List: Siemens KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Client List: Cisco KWs - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/Client List: AT&T ALT KWs - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/Mercedes KWs - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/FX Excludes All Disney

client-blocklists/Client List: Boeing KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Client List: Inpixon KWs - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/Client List: Google KWs - INCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Client List: AT&T KWs 2021 - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/Philip Morris KWs - INCLUDES ANY 

client-blocklists/Capital One KWs 2 - INCLUDES ANY - 1.4.21

client-blocklists/Bank of America Merrill Lynch KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Client List: IBM KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Google PG KWs - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/Chase KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

client-blocklists/Client List: Office Depot KWs - INCLUDES ANY

client-blocklists/Client List: ETrade KWs - EXCLUDES ALL

prism://prism.query/two-sites,/technology,/politics/powerpost/the-technology-202?limit=20