Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A chimeric hemagglutinin-based universal influenza virus vaccine approach induces broad and long-lasting immunity in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase I trial

Subjects

Abstract

Seasonal influenza viruses constantly change through antigenic drift and the emergence of pandemic influenza viruses through antigenic shift is unpredictable. Conventional influenza virus vaccines induce strain-specific neutralizing antibodies against the variable immunodominant globular head domain of the viral hemagglutinin protein. This necessitates frequent re-formulation of vaccines and handicaps pandemic preparedness. In this completed, observer-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I trial (NCT03300050), safety and immunogenicity of chimeric hemagglutinin-based vaccines were tested in healthy, 18–39-year-old US adults. The study aimed to test the safety and ability of the vaccines to elicit broadly cross-reactive antibodies against the hemagglutinin stalk domain. Participants were enrolled into five groups to receive vaccinations with live-attenuated followed by AS03-adjuvanted inactivated vaccine (n = 20), live-attenuated followed by inactivated vaccine (n = 15), twice AS03-adjuvanted inactivated vaccine (n = 16) or placebo (n = 5, intranasal followed by intramuscular; n = 10, twice intramuscular) 3 months apart. Vaccination was found to be safe and induced a broad, strong, durable and functional immune response targeting the conserved, immunosubdominant stalk of the hemagglutinin. The results suggest that chimeric hemagglutinins have the potential to be developed as universal vaccines that protect broadly against influenza viruses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of vaccine concept and clinical trial.
Fig. 2: Consort diagram.
Fig. 3: Serum anti-H1 stalk titers.
Fig. 4: Breadth of the antibody response.
Fig. 5: Characterization of functional antibodies.
Fig. 6: Passive transfer mouse data and protective effect of the induced stalk-reactive antibodies.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The protocol, statistical analysis plan and results will be available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03300050. Underlying data are available upon request (excluding identifiable information).

References

  1. Palese, P. Influenza: old and new threats. Nat. Med. 10, S82–S87 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, M. C. W. et al. Frequent genetic mismatch between vaccine strains and circulating seasonal influenza viruses, Hong Kong, China, 1996–2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 24, 1825–1834 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Flannery, B. et al. Spread of antigenically drifted influenza A(H3N2) viruses and vaccine effectiveness in the United States during the 2018–2019 season. J. Infect. Dis. 221, 8–15 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Skowronski, D. M. et al. Paradoxical clade- and age-specific vaccine effectiveness during the 2018/19 influenza A(H3N2) epidemic in Canada: potential imprint-regulated effect of vaccine (I-REV). Euro Surveill. 24, 1900585 (2019).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Owusu, D. et al. Early season pediatric influenza B/Victoria virus infections associated with a recently emerged virus subclade—Louisiana, 2019. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 69, 40–43 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Virk, R. K. et al. Divergent evolutionary trajectories of influenza B viruses underlie their contemporaneous epidemic activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 619–628 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krammer, F. & Palese, P. Advances in the development of influenza virus vaccines. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 167–182 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krammer, F. The human antibody response to influenza A virus infection and vaccination. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 383–397 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hobson, D., Curry, R. L., Beare, A. S. & Ward-Gardner, A. The role of serum haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody in protection against challenge infection with influenza A2 and B viruses. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 70, 767–777 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heaton, N. S., Sachs, D., Chen, C. J., Hai, R. & Palese, P. Genome-wide mutagenesis of influenza virus reveals unique plasticity of the hemagglutinin and NS1 proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20248–20253 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Doud, M. B. & Bloom, J. D. Accurate measurement of the effects of all amino-acid mutations on influenza hemagglutinin. Viruses 8, 155 (2016).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirkpatrick, E., Qiu, X., Wilson, P. C., Bahl, J. & Krammer, F. The influenza virus hemagglutinin head evolves faster than the stalk domain. Sci. Rep. 8, 10432 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Okuno, Y., Isegawa, Y., Sasao, F. & Ueda, S. A common neutralizing epitope conserved between the hemagglutinins of influenza A virus H1 and H2 strains. J. Virol. 67, 2552–2558 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, N. C. & Wilson, I. A. Structural insights into the design of novel anti-influenza therapies. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 115–121 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Corti, D. et al. A neutralizing antibody selected from plasma cells that binds to group 1 and group 2 influenza A hemagglutinins. Science 333, 850–856 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dreyfus, C. et al. Highly conserved protective epitopes on influenza B viruses. Science 337, 1343–1348 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ng, S. et al. Novel correlates of protection against pandemic H1N1 influenza A virus infection. Nat. Med. 25, 962–967 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dilillo, D. J., Tan, G. S., Palese, P. & Ravetch, J. V. Broadly neutralizing hemagglutinin stalk-specific antibodies require FcγR interactions for protection against influenza virus in vivo. Nat. Med. 20, 143–151 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Brandenburg, B. et al. Mechanisms of hemagglutinin targeted influenza virus neutralization. PLoS ONE 8, e80034 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rajendran, M. et al. Analysis of anti-influenza virus neuraminidase antibodies in children, adults, and the elderly by ELISA and enzyme inhibition: evidence for original antigenic Sin. mBio 8, e02281–16 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hai, R. et al. Influenza viruses expressing chimeric hemagglutinins: globular head and stalk domains derived from different subtypes. J. Virol. 86, 5774–5781 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Margine, I. et al. Hemagglutinin stalk-based universal vaccine constructs protect against group 2 influenza A viruses. J. Virol. 87, 10435–10446 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Krammer, F., Pica, N., Hai, R., Margine, I. & Palese, P. Chimeric hemagglutinin influenza virus vaccine constructs elicit broadly protective stalk-specific antibodies. J. Virol. 87, 6542–6550 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Nachbagauer, R. et al. A universal influenza virus vaccine candidate confers protection against pandemic H1N1 infection in preclinical ferret studies. NPJ Vaccines 2, 26 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Choi, A. et al. Chimeric hemagglutinin-based influenza virus vaccines induce protective stalk-specific humoral immunity and cellular responses in mice. Immunohorizons 3, 133–148 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Nachbagauer, R. et al. A chimeric haemagglutinin-based influenza split virion vaccine adjuvanted with AS03 induces protective stalk-reactive antibodies in mice. NPJ Vaccines 1, 16015 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nachbagauer, R. et al. Age dependence and isotype specificity of influenza virus hemagglutinin stalk-reactive antibodies in humans. mBio 7, e01996–15 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sui, J. et al. Wide prevalence of heterosubtypic broadly neutralizing human anti-influenza A antibodies. Clin. Infect. Dis. 52, 1003–1009 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bernstein, D. I. et al. Immunogenicity of chimeric haemagglutinin-based, universal influenza virus vaccine candidates: interim results of a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 20, 80–91 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Talaat, K. R. et al. A live attenuated influenza A(H5N1) vaccine induces long-term immunity in the absence of a primary antibody response. J. Infect. Dis. 209, 1860–1869 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rudenko, L. et al. Assessment of immune responses to H5N1 inactivated influenza vaccine among individuals previously primed with H5N2 live attenuated influenza vaccine. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 11, 2839–2848 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Barría, M. I. et al. Localized mucosal response to intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine in adults. J. Infect. Dis. 207, 115–124 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee, J. et al. Molecular-level analysis of the serum antibody repertoire in young adults before and after seasonal influenza vaccination. Nat. Med. 22, 1456–1464 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ekiert, D. C. et al. Cross-neutralization of influenza A viruses mediated by a single antibody loop. Nature 489, 526–532 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Khurana, S. et al. MF59 adjuvant enhances diversity and affinity of antibody-mediated immune response to pandemic influenza vaccines. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 85ra48 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ekiert, D. C. et al. Antibody recognition of a highly conserved influenza virus epitope. Science 324, 246–251 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sui, J. et al. Structural and functional bases for broad-spectrum neutralization of avian and human influenza A viruses. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 265–273 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Nachbagauer, R. et al. Induction of broadly reactive anti-hemagglutinin stalk antibodies by an H5N1 vaccine in humans. J. Virol. 88, 13260–13268 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ellebedy, A. H. et al. Induction of broadly cross-reactive antibody responses to the influenza HA stem region following H5N1 vaccination in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13133–13138 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jacobsen, H. et al. Influenza virus hemagglutinin stalk-specific antibodies in human serum are a surrogate marker for in vivo protection in a serum transfer mouse challenge model. mBio 8, e01463–17 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Bangaru, S. et al. A site of vulnerability on the influenza virus hemagglutinin head domain trimer interface. Cell 177, 1136–1152.e1118 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Watanabe, A. et al. Antibodies to a conserved influenza head interface epitope protect by an IgG subtype-dependent mechanism. Cell 177, 1124–1135.e1116 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Nachbagauer, R. et al. Pandemic influenza virus vaccines boost hemagglutinin stalk-specific antibody responses in primed adult and pediatric cohorts. NPJ Vaccines 4, 51 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. He, W. et al. Alveolar macrophages are critical for broadly-reactive antibody-mediated protection against influenza A virus in mice. Nat. Commun. 8, 846 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Chromikova, V. et al. Activity of human serum antibodies in an influenza virus hemagglutinin stalk-based ADCC reporter assay correlates with activity in a CD107a degranulation assay. Vaccine 38, 1953–1961 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cohet, C. et al. Safety of AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccines: a review of the evidence. Vaccine 37, 3006–3021 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Krammer, F. et al. H3 stalk-based chimeric hemagglutinin influenza virus constructs protect mice from H7N9 challenge. J. Virol. 88, 2340–2343 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun, W. et al. Development of influenza B universal vaccine candidates using the ‘mosaic’ hemagglutinin approach. J. Virol. 93, e00333–19 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Pitisuttithum, P. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a live attenuated influenza H5 candidate vaccine strain A/17/turkey/Turkey/05/133 H5N2 and its priming effects for potential pre-pandemic use: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 17, 833–842 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Isakova-Sivak, I. et al. Genetic bases of the temperature-sensitive phenotype of a master donor virus used in live attenuated influenza vaccines: A/Leningrad/134/17/57 (H2N2). Virology 412, 297–305 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Isakova-Sivak, I. et al. Broadly protective anti-hemagglutinin stalk antibodies induced by live attenuated influenza vaccine expressing chimeric hemagglutinin. Virology 518, 313–323 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rajendran, M. et al. An immuno-assay to quantify influenza virus hemagglutinin with correctly folded stalk domains in vaccine preparations. PLoS ONE 13, e0194830 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Martínez-Sobrido, L. & García-Sastre, A. Generation of recombinant influenza virus from plasmid DNA. J. Vis. Exp. 3, 2057 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hong, M. et al. Antibody recognition of the pandemic H1N1 influenza virus hemagglutinin receptor binding site. J. Virol. 87, 12471–12480 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Margine, I., Palese, P. & Krammer, F. Expression of functional recombinant hemagglutinin and neuraminidase proteins from the novel H7N9 influenza virus using the baculovirus expression system. J. Vis. Exp. 6, e51112 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Impagliazzo, A. et al. A stable trimeric influenza hemagglutinin stem as a broadly protective immunogen. Science 349, 1301–1306 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bliss, C. M. et al. Targeting antigen to the surface of EVs improves the in vivo immunogenicity of human and non-human adenoviral vaccines in mice. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 16, 108–125 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stadlbauer, D. et al. Broadly protective human antibodies that target the active site of influenza virus neuraminidase. Science 366, 499–504 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, G. et al. Characterization of swine-origin H1N1 canine influenza viruses. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 8, 1017–1026 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Chromikova, V., Zaragoza, M. A. & Krammer, F. Generation of a serum free CHO DG44 cell line stably producing a broadly protective anti-influenza virus monoclonal antibody. PLoS ONE 12, e0183315 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. McMahon, M. et al. Vaccination with viral vectors expressing chimeric hemagglutinin, NP and M1 antigens protects ferrets against influenza virus challenge. Front. Immunol. 10, 2005 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Lu, Y. et al. Immune response to influenza vaccine in children with inflammatory bowel disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 104, 444–453 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Treanor, J. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a baculovirus-expressed hemagglutinin influenza vaccine: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 297, 1577–1582 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the research team at the Department of Microbiology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai for supporting the development of this vaccine concept since 2011. We also thank the teams at PATH (with special acknowledgement to J.C. Victor, R. Wahid and K. Mahmood), Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Duke University, the University of Chicago, GSK, NEOMED-LABS and the EMMES Corporation for their work on this project. We are grateful for help from V. Simon at Mount Sinai with IRB protocol development, D. Wentworth and L. M. Chen at the US CDC with the initial LAIV seed virus rescue and for help from D. Suarez from the US Department of Agriculture for pathogenicity testing of the vaccine virus strains. We thank G. Georgiou for providing monoclonal antibody D1 H1-3/H3-3 used in competition ELISAs. This study was funded in part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (grant OPP1084518). Basic research leading to this trial was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (grants P01 AI097092, HHSN26620070010C, HHSN272201400008C, U19 AI109946, R01 AI128821). NIAID continues to support analysis of samples from this trial through a Collaborative Influenza Vaccine Innovation Centers contract (75N93019C00051). GSK made adjuvants and vaccine preparations available and contributed through providing expertise as well (funding for this study was provided by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA). The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of the Gates Foundation. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA was provided the opportunity to review a preliminary version of this manuscript for factual accuracy, but the authors are solely responsible for final content and interpretation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.F., A.N., D.I.B., J.G., E.B.W., F.B.-S., C. Claeys, C.G., C.M., M.M.N., A.S., M.V.d.W. and B.L.I. are responsible for conducting, managing and coordinating the clinical trial. Laboratory experiments were performed by R.N., D.S., T.A., M.A.B., D.B., C.B., C. Capuano, J.M.C., V.C., L.C., A.W.F., A.J., K.J., M.M.M., M.M.N., S.S. and W.S. Resources and methods were provided by L.C., T.A., W.S., A.W.F., V.C., S.S., P.C.W. and F.K. All authors are responsible for writing, reviewing and editing the manuscript. Data analysis was performed by R.N., J.F., A.N., F.B.-S., D.S., J.M.C., V.C., C.G., C.M., A.S., B.L.I., A.G.-S., P.P. and F.K. Quality assurance on assays was performed at ISMMS by C.M.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Krammer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) has issued patents and filed patent applications covering the use of chimeric hemagglutinin antigens as vaccines. R.N., A.G.-S., P.P. and F.K. are named as inventors on these patents and applications. The ISMMS and the inventors have received payments as consideration for these rights. The laboratories of A.G.-S., P.P. and F.K. were also engaged in a research program that was funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA. M.V.d.W. declares that she is employed by the GSK group of companies and declares no nonfinancial conflicts of interest. C. Claeys was an employee of the GSK group of companies at the time the study was performed. B.L.I. was an employee of the GSK group of companies until 2017 and held shares from this group of companies at the time the study was performed. He is also named as inventor on a patent family regarding influenza virus vaccine constructs filed by the ISMMS and the GSK group of companies. E.B.W. is a coinvestigator for a clinical trial supported by Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Alison Farrell is the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review in collaboration with the rest of the editorial team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Microneutralization titers.

Microneutralization titers against cH6/1N5 virus (a), pandemic H1N1 virus (c), avian-swine H1N1 virus (e) and H5N8 virus (g). Faint lines indicate reactivity of different individuals; bold lines indicate geometric mean titers of the respective groups. Biologically independent samples; group 1: n = 19, group 2: n = 14, group 4: n = 15 groups 3 + 5: n = 13(3 + 10); examined in one independent experiment. Geometric mean fold induction of antibody titers based on data in a, c, e and g is shown in b, d, f and h.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers.

Hemagglutination inhibition titers against cH6/1N5 virus (a), pandemic H1N1 virus (c), avian-swine H1N1 virus (e) and H5N8 virus (g) as well as cH8/1N1 (I) and cH5/1N1 (k) vaccine strains. Faint lines indicate reactivity of different individuals; bold lines indicate geometric mean titers of the respective groups. Biologically independent samples; group 1: n = 19, group 2: n = 14, group 4: n = 15 groups 3 + 5: n = 13(3 + 10); examined in one independent experiment. Geometric mean fold induction of antibody titers based on data in a, c, e, g, i and k is shown in b, d, f, h, j and l.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–10 and Supplementary Tables 1–3.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nachbagauer, R., Feser, J., Naficy, A. et al. A chimeric hemagglutinin-based universal influenza virus vaccine approach induces broad and long-lasting immunity in a randomized, placebo-controlled phase I trial. Nat Med 27, 106–114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1118-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1118-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology