The climate lobby: a sectoral analysis of lobbying spending on climate change in the USA, 2000 to 2016

• Baumgartner F, Leech B (1998) Basic interests: the importance of groups in politics and in political science. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Baumgartner F, Berry J, Hojnacki M, Leech B, Kimball D (2009) Lobbying and policy change: who wins, who loses, and why. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Brulle RJ (2014) Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of US climate change counter-movement organizations. Clim Chang 122:681–694

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Brulle R, Dunlap R (2015) Sociology and climate change introduction: pp. 1–31 in Dunlap, Riley, Brulle, Robert J., (eds.) Climate change and society: sociological perspectives. Oxford Press: New York

  Google Scholar 

• Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Clim Chang 114(2):169–188

• Burstein P (2010) Public opinion, public policy, and democracy. In: Leicht K, Jenkins J (eds) Handbook of politics: state and society in global perspective. Springer, New York, pp 63–79

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Cook KS, Whitmeyer JM (1992) Two approaches to social structure: exchange theory and network analysis. Annu Rev Sociol 18:109–127

  Article  Google Scholar 

• De Figueiredo JM, Richter BK (2014) Advancing the empirical research on lobbying. Annual Review of Political Science. (17)163–185

• Delmas M, Lim J, Nairn-Birch N (2016) Corporate environmental performance and lobbying. Academy of Management Discoveries 2(2):175–197

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Downie C (2017) Business actors, political resistance, and strategies for policymakers. Energy Policy 108:583–592

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Drutman L (2015) The business of America is lobbying. Oxford University Press, New York

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Edwards L (2016) The role of public relations in deliberative systems. J Commun 66:60–81

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Farrell J (2016) Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(1):92–97

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fuchs S (2001) Against essentialism: a theory of culture and society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Grossmann M (2014) Artists of the possible. Oxford University Press, New York

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Grumbach JM (2015) Polluting industries as climate protagonists: cap and trade and the problem of business preferences. Business and Politics 17(4):633–659

• Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? Am J Sociol 104(5):1439–1493

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kim S, Urpelainen J, Yang J (2016) Electric utilities and American climate policy: lobbying by expected winners and losers. Journal of Public Policy 36(2):251–275

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Knoke D (1990) Political networks: the structural perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Knoke D, Yang S (2008) Social network analysis (Vol. 154). Sage

• LaPira TM, Thomas HF (2014) Revolving door lobbyists and interest representation. Interest Groups & Advocacy. 3(1):4–29

• Laumann EO, Knoke D (1987) The organizational state: social choice in national policy domains. Univ of Wisconsin Press, Madison

  Google Scholar 

• McGarity TO (2014) The disruptive politics of climate disruption. Nova Law Review 38(3):3

  Google Scholar 

• Milbrath L (1963) The Washington lobbyists. Rand McNally, Chicago

  Google Scholar 

• Podolny JM, Page KL (1998) Network forms of organization. Annu Rev Sociol 24:57–76

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shove E (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ Plan A 42:1273–1285

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Somerville I, Ramsey P (2012) Public relations and politics. In: Theaker A (ed) The public relations handbook, 4th edn. Routledge, New York, pp 38–59

  Google Scholar 

Download references