New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pact checking #422
Merged
Merged
Pact checking #422
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bts
reviewed
Mar 6, 2019
I can add the trace steps once I take care of the pending capability analysis tweaks I need to finish up |
joelburget
force-pushed
the
pact-checking
branch
from
March 8, 2019 16:34
dc557ce
to
fdd814a
Compare
bts
reviewed
Mar 11, 2019
bts
reviewed
Mar 11, 2019
bts
reviewed
Mar 11, 2019
joelburget
force-pushed
the
pact-checking
branch
from
March 11, 2019 23:02
76e0eae
to
1c8907c
Compare
(After the first)
We were mistakenly translating pacts as defuns causing test failures.
(used in the previous commit to make debugging easier)
bts
reviewed
Mar 13, 2019
bts
reviewed
Mar 13, 2019
bts
reviewed
Mar 13, 2019
At this point we generate the correct graph for the failure of the last pact test -- the very last test in the test suite.
Fixes: 1. We had mistakenly reversed the order of cancels and rollbacks in pact translation. 2. In evaluation we had (nondeterministically) tagged some rollbacks as triggering, even though their corresponding step had not run.
bts
reviewed
Mar 20, 2019
* reset registry * reset `aeGuardPasses` * unset any `rowExists` that are set to false.
Rollback steps are executed all at once.
This fails to parse in CI.
Also, several cosmetic cleanups in AnalyzeSpec.
bts
reviewed
Mar 27, 2019
bts
reviewed
Mar 27, 2019
bts
reviewed
Mar 27, 2019
bts
reviewed
Mar 27, 2019
bts
reviewed
Mar 27, 2019
bts
suggested changes
Mar 27, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're very close. Mainly a naming question
Primarily, renaming "nondets" to "pactSteps".
bts
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Feedback please. Things that still need to be done:
(property (= (column-delta accounts 'balance) 1))
for a pact, does that mean that the sum of that column is the same when the pact finishes executing, or that the code in the pact itself doesn't change the sum of the column? Edit: we're going with the latter