Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 86 Agenda #165

Closed
Souptacular opened this issue Apr 17, 2020 · 15 comments
Closed

Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 86 Agenda #165

Souptacular opened this issue Apr 17, 2020 · 15 comments

Comments

@edsonayllon
Copy link
Contributor

Please add a status update for EIP-1057 for this call.

@Souptacular
Copy link
Contributor Author

@edsonayllon Done!

@ineffectualproperty
Copy link

Hey @Souptacular - It would be great if we could present the Parity/Open Ethereum benchmarking results related to EIP-2565 that were requested in last week's call.

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

timbeiko commented Apr 24, 2020

While this has been discussed a bit on the Core Devs gitter, I'd like to bring up this PR (ethereum/EIPs#2516) on the call (at the end, if time permits, as part of EIPIP) to get feedback on it and make sure the community is aware of it.

@gcolvin
Copy link

gcolvin commented Apr 24, 2020

@Souptacular -- @AndreaLanfranchi would like to join the meeting to give a brief progress report on https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1057.
I think the fix for the Kik exploit and the Kawpow adaptation by Ravencoin are of most interest.
ifdefelse/ProgPOW#52
https://minermore.com/docs/help/ravencoin_fork/

@gcolvin
Copy link

gcolvin commented Apr 27, 2020

Note that I do not want to reach any decision on ProgPow at this meeting . I only want to present the current state of EIP-1057 development.
@Souptacular @AndreaLanfranchi @bitsbetrippin @ifthenelse @vorot93 @ALL

@gballet
Copy link
Member

gballet commented Apr 28, 2020

@Souptacular could we please add ethereum/EIPs#2584 ?

@Souptacular
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gballet @ineffectualproperty @timbeiko @gcolvin
Added all of your items to the agenda.

@axic
Copy link
Member

axic commented Apr 29, 2020

Can we discuss the proposals relating to EIP-2315 at https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-2315-simple-subroutines-for-the-evm-analysis/4229 by any chance?

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

If there is time/value I can give an update on the EIP-1559 implementers' call. I shared a summary on twitter, too.

@shamatar
Copy link

shamatar commented May 1, 2020

I will not be able to participate today, but for client integration Danno has asked to assign contract addresses for EIP2537, would you decide on it please?

@holiman
Copy link

holiman commented May 1, 2020

@shamatar the 2537 EIP points to a go-library for 1962, but ISTR having seen somewhere a repository which was more integrated with go-ethereum, and which was specificaly for 2537. But now I can't find it -- would you happen to know which one I'm searching for?

@holiman
Copy link

holiman commented May 1, 2020

Regarding testing, I don't want to take up too much time on the call, so I'll just post it here.

  1. Hive is up again, four client implementations are "on". We're working to get all of them to be able to run all tests. The prod env is at https://hivetests.ethdevops.io/, nothing else.
  2. Dmitry briefly mentioned on the last call that we (go-ethereum) would like to provide a stateless "state transition tool", instead of retesteth=client implementation. The first 'draft' of it exists in this PR: cmd/evm: add state transition tool for testing go-ethereum#20958 , and docs/specs are here

@shamatar
Copy link

shamatar commented May 1, 2020

@shamatar the 2537 EIP points to a go-library for 1962, but ISTR having seen somewhere a repository which was more integrated with go-ethereum, and which was specificaly for 2537. But now I can't find it -- would you happen to know which one I'm searching for?

I thought that updated the link, but specialized one is here https://github.com/kilic/eip2537

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

Closed in favor of #169

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants