Skip to content

Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 86 Agenda #165

Closed

Activity

edsonayllon

edsonayllon commented on Apr 23, 2020

@edsonayllon
Contributor

Please add a status update for EIP-1057 for this call.

Souptacular

Souptacular commented on Apr 23, 2020

@Souptacular
ContributorAuthor
ineffectualproperty

ineffectualproperty commented on Apr 23, 2020

@ineffectualproperty

Hey @Souptacular - It would be great if we could present the Parity/Open Ethereum benchmarking results related to EIP-2565 that were requested in last week's call.

timbeiko

timbeiko commented on Apr 24, 2020

@timbeiko
Contributor

While this has been discussed a bit on the Core Devs gitter, I'd like to bring up this PR (ethereum/EIPs#2516) on the call (at the end, if time permits, as part of EIPIP) to get feedback on it and make sure the community is aware of it.

gcolvin

gcolvin commented on Apr 24, 2020

@gcolvin

@Souptacular -- @AndreaLanfranchi would like to join the meeting to give a brief progress report on https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1057.
I think the fix for the Kik exploit and the Kawpow adaptation by Ravencoin are of most interest.
ifdefelse/ProgPOW#52
https://minermore.com/docs/help/ravencoin_fork/

gcolvin

gcolvin commented on Apr 27, 2020

@gcolvin

Note that I do not want to reach any decision on ProgPow at this meeting . I only want to present the current state of EIP-1057 development.
@Souptacular @AndreaLanfranchi @bitsbetrippin @ifthenelse @vorot93 @ALL

gballet

gballet commented on Apr 28, 2020

@gballet
Member

@Souptacular could we please add ethereum/EIPs#2584 ?

Souptacular

Souptacular commented on Apr 28, 2020

@Souptacular
ContributorAuthor

@gballet @ineffectualproperty @timbeiko @gcolvin
Added all of your items to the agenda.

axic

axic commented on Apr 29, 2020

@axic
Member

Can we discuss the proposals relating to EIP-2315 at https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-2315-simple-subroutines-for-the-evm-analysis/4229 by any chance?

timbeiko

timbeiko commented on Apr 30, 2020

@timbeiko
Contributor

If there is time/value I can give an update on the EIP-1559 implementers' call. I shared a summary on twitter, too.

shamatar

shamatar commented on May 1, 2020

@shamatar

I will not be able to participate today, but for client integration Danno has asked to assign contract addresses for EIP2537, would you decide on it please?

holiman

holiman commented on May 1, 2020

@holiman

@shamatar the 2537 EIP points to a go-library for 1962, but ISTR having seen somewhere a repository which was more integrated with go-ethereum, and which was specificaly for 2537. But now I can't find it -- would you happen to know which one I'm searching for?

holiman

holiman commented on May 1, 2020

@holiman

Regarding testing, I don't want to take up too much time on the call, so I'll just post it here.

  1. Hive is up again, four client implementations are "on". We're working to get all of them to be able to run all tests. The prod env is at https://hivetests.ethdevops.io/, nothing else.
  2. Dmitry briefly mentioned on the last call that we (go-ethereum) would like to provide a stateless "state transition tool", instead of retesteth=client implementation. The first 'draft' of it exists in this PR: cmd/evm: add state transition tool for testing go-ethereum#20958 , and docs/specs are here
shamatar

shamatar commented on May 1, 2020

@shamatar

@shamatar the 2537 EIP points to a go-library for 1962, but ISTR having seen somewhere a repository which was more integrated with go-ethereum, and which was specificaly for 2537. But now I can't find it -- would you happen to know which one I'm searching for?

I thought that updated the link, but specialized one is here https://github.com/kilic/eip2537

timbeiko

timbeiko commented on May 13, 2020

@timbeiko
Contributor

Closed in favor of #169

added
ACDType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensus
ExecutionLayer: Issues that affect the execution layer
on Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    ACDType: All Core Dev calls - execution & consensusExecutionLayer: Issues that affect the execution layer

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @axic@holiman@gballet@Souptacular@shamatar

        Issue actions

          Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 86 Agenda · Issue #165 · ethereum/pm